Perez v. Sao et al

Filing 9

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/25/15: Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LOUIS PEREZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13

Case No. 1:14-cv-01474 DLB PC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v.
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

14

J. SAO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff Louis Perez (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

17
18

forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on

19

September 22, 2014.1 He names J. Sao, M.D., K. C. Lo, M.D., and D. Beregovskaya, M.D., as

20

Defendants.

21

On July 17, 2015, the Court screened the complaint and issued an order dismissing the

22

complaint with leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was granted thirty (30) days to comply.

23

Over thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise

24

communicate with the Court.

25

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be

26

dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff shall file a response to this order within fourteen (14)

27

days of the date of service.

28
1

Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate on October 1, 2014.

1

1
2

Failure to show cause, or failure to respond to this order, will result in dismissal of this
action.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
Dated:
6

/s/ Dennis

August 25, 2015

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2