Gomez, et al. v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/11/2016. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
CATARINA M. BENITEZ SBN 256518
LAW OFFICES OF CATARINA M. BENITEZ
475 Bullard Avenue
Clovis, CA 93612
Telephone: (559) 472-7337
Facsimile: (559) 579-1100
Attorney for Plaintiffs, GENO GOMEZ and MARIA GOMEZ
6
7
LAW OFFICES OF CATARINA M. BENITEZ
475 BULLARD AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93612
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION
10
GENO GOMEZ and MARIA GOMEZ;
Case No. 1:14-cv-01499-BAM
11
12
Plaintiffs,
13
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER
vs.
14
15
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC; a
limited liability corporation; and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive;
16
Defendants,
17
18
19
Plaintiffs GENO GOMEZ and MARIA GOMEZ (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant
20
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate
21
and agree as follows:
22
Plaintiffs hereby DISMISS the above-referenced action WITH PREJUDICE. The
23
parties agree to bear their own attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
Respectfully submitted,
1
2
3
Date: October 7, 2016
LAW OFFICES OF
CATARINA M. BENITEZ
4
5
By:
6
7
LAW OFFICES OF CATARINA M. BENITEZ
475 BULLARD AVENUE
CLOVIS, CA 93612
8
9
Date: October 7, 2016
/s/Catarina M. Benitez____________
CATARINA M. BENITEZ,
Attorney for Plaintiffs
GENO GOMEZ and MARIA GOMEZ
SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
10
11
By:
12
13
/s/ Megan Kelly__________
MEGAN KELLY
Attorneys for Defendant NATIONSTAR
MORTGAGE LLC
14
ORDER
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED THAT pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, this case is Dismissed with
17
18
prejudice. The parties agree to bear their own attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses. The Clerk
of the Court is instructed to close this case.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: October 11, 2016
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?