California River Watch v. County of Fresno

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER CONCERNING PLEADINGS AND CONTINUING INTIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DATE. The Initial Scheduling Conference set for December 11, 2014 at 11:00 AM is now set for February 19, 2015 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/30/2014. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DANIEL C. CEDERBORG County Counsel BRUCE B. JOHNSON Principal Deputy County Counsel – SBN 142968 FRESNO COUNTY COUNSEL 2220 Tulare Street, Suite 500 Fresno, California 93721 6 Telephone: (559) 600-3479 Facsimile: (559) 600-3480 7 Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF FRESNO 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, 13 Case No. 1:14-cv-01501-MJS STIPULATION AND ORDER CONCERNING PLEADINGS AND CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DATE Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 COUNTY OF FRESNO; DOES 1-10, Inclusive Defendants. 18 19 20 RECITALS 21 In plaintiff’s original Complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendant, COUNTY OF FRESNO 22 (“the County”), violated provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 23 300f, et seq. The County filed its Answer to Complaint (Doc. # 5) on October 21, 2014. After 24 the County filed its Answer, the parties filed pleadings consenting to the jurisdiction of U.S. 25 Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. In response, the Court entered a text-only minute order 26 reassigning the case to Judge Seng. (Doc. # 9.) Thereafter, the Court entered another text-only 27 minute order setting an Initial Scheduling Conference for December 11, 2014, at 11:00 a.m. in 28 Courtroom 6 (Judge Seng’s courtroom). (Doc. # 10.) Stipulation and Order 1 Case No. 1:14-cv-01501 1 On September 25, 2014, plaintiff also served upon the County a notice of intent to sue 2 under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901, et 3 seq. Plaintiff avers that the RCRA notice is founded upon the same basic set of facts as the 4 instant lawsuit, which presently contains only an SDWA-based claim for relief. Plaintiff further 5 avers that plaintiff is precluded from filing a RCRA-based suit until 90 days after service of the 6 RCRA notice. Plaintiff further avers that plaintiff intends to amend the above-referenced lawsuit 7 to include a RCRA-based claim for relief, but cannot do so until after the Court’s recently- 8 calendared Initial Scheduling Conference (again: December 11, 2014). The parties agree that optimally, the operative pleadings – complaint and answer -- 9 10 should be settled before a Joint Scheduling Report is required to be filed and an Initial 11 Scheduling Conference is to be held. For that reason, the parties stipulate and agree as provided 12 below. STIPULATION 13 14 IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that: 15 1. Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint no later than January 8, 2015. 16 2. The County may file a pleading responsive to the First Amended Complaint no 17 18 later than twenty-one (21) days after plaintiff files and serves the First Amended Complaint. 3. On or before February 12, 2015, the parties shall file in CM/ECF, and e-mail to 19 mjsorders@caed.uscourts.gov, a Joint Scheduling Report, carefully prepared by the parties and 20 signed by all counsel. 21 4. An Initial Scheduling Conference shall be, and is, set for February 19, 2015, at 22 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6 (MJS), before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. 23 Dated: October 30, 2014 DANIEL C. CEDERBORG County Counsel 24 25 S/ Bruce B. Johnson By: 26 BRUCE B. JOHNSON Principal Deputy, Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF FRESNO 27 28 Stipulation and Order 2 Case No. 1:14-cv-01501 1 Dated: October 30, 2014 LAW OFFICE OF DAVID J. WEINSOFF 2 S/ David J. Weinsoff 3 By: DAVID J. WEINSOFF, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH 4 5 6 7 ORDER 8 The Court, having reviewed the foregoing recitals and stipulation in Case No. 1:14-cv9 10 01501-MJS , and finding good cause exists, hereby ORDERS the stipulation APPROVED. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: October 30, 2014 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 ____________________________ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order 3 Case No. 1:14-cv-01501 1 2 3 4 5 PROOF OF SERVICE 6 California River Watch v. County of Fresno, et al. United States District Court 1:14-CV-01501-MJS 7 I, JOAN CUADROS, declare as follows: 8 9 10 I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action. I am employed at the Fresno County Counsel’s Office, 2220 Tulare Street, Fifth Floor, Fresno, California, 93721. 11 On October 30, 2014, I served a copy(ies) of the within documents 12 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONCERNING PLEADINGS AND CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DATE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 on the interested party(ies) in said action addressed as follows: Jack Silver, Esq. Law Office of Jack Silver Post Office Box 5469 Santa Rosa, CA 95402-5469 Via electronic filing David J. Weinsoff, Esq. Law Office of David J. Weinsoff 138 Ridgeway Avenue Fairfax, CA 94930 Via electronic filing 22 by placing the document(s) listed above for mailing in the United States mail at Fresno, California, in accordance with my employer's ordinary practice for collection and processing of mail, and addressed as set forth above. 23 24 by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth above. 25 26 27 28 X via electronic filing. The above party/ies is/are registered with the United States District Court to receive notice of electronically filed documents. Per ECF rules, hard copies must be served only on parties who are not set up for electronic notification. Stipulation and Order 4 Case No. 1:14-cv-01501 1 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 30, 2014, at Fresno, California. 2 S/ Joan Cuadros JOAN CUADROS 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order 5 Case No. 1:14-cv-01501

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?