Neufeld, Jr. v. Winco Holdings, Inc.

Filing 15

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/20/2015. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/18/2016 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Jury Trial set for 4/4/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JERRY W. NEUFELD, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 1:14-cv-01505-KJM-JLT v. STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) WINCO HOLDINGS, INC., 15 ORDER Defendant, 16 17 An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on February 19, 2015. Michelle 18 19 Iarusso appeared for Plaintiff; Christina Jackson appeared for Defendant. Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on January 5, 2015, and discussed a 20 21 schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following order: 22 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without leave 23 24 of court, good cause having been shown. 25 II. 26 ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without leave of 27 court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth 28 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992). 1 1 III. 2 JURISDICTION/VENUE Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441 and 1446. Jurisdiction and venue 3 are not disputed. 4 IV. DISCOVERY 5 The parties have exchanged the initial disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil 6 Procedure 26(a). All discovery shall be completed by September 18, 2015. In this context, 7 “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been 8 taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if 9 necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to 10 compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local 11 rules of this court. While the assigned magistrate judge reviews proposed discovery phase 12 protective orders, requests to seal or redact are decided by Judge Mueller, as discussed in more 13 detail below. In addition, while the assigned magistrate judge handles discovery motions, the 14 magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set in this order, even in connection with a discovery 15 matter. 16 V. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES 17 All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other parties 18 the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial not later 19 than October 16, 2015. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report prepared and 20 signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B). By November 21 20, 2015, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a supplemental list of 22 expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an expert designated by an 23 adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation has not previously 24 retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation shall be accompanied 25 by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated above. 26 Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all 27 likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert 28 witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering 2 1 the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably 2 anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were 3 promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made 4 available for deposition. For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used at trial 5 6 to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which 7 include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert 8 opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the 9 case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert 10 for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient, 11 retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the 12 express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state 13 in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons. 14 All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render an 15 informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and 16 complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted 17 to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition 18 taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by December 26, 2015. 19 VI. MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE 20 All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or 21 other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than December 4, 2015.1 The parties may 22 obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s website. 23 24 All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule 230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply: 25 (a) The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and 26 (b) When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the 27 28 1 Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date. 3 1 opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday. 2 Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to 3 the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651, 4 652-53 (9th Cir. 1994). 5 The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty (20) 6 pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases must be 7 made through the courtroom deputy clerk at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the 8 motion. 9 Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel, counsel 10 shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the 11 contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate 12 the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party 13 considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel 14 should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for 15 summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution 16 by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during 17 the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the 18 motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and 19 confer efforts. 20 The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device designed to 21 address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon dispositional motions 22 presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions in limine. Although 23 all motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial statement, the court will 24 hear only those motions it has identified to counsel before the hearing date. 25 The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could have been 26 tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off date may 27 constitute waiver of such issue. 28 VII. SEALING 4 1 No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the prior 2 approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the record 3 on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be directed to her 4 and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be governed by Local 5 Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the discovery phase of 6 litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the public docket. The 7 court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of sealing or redaction. 8 If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has identified as 9 confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the opposing party 10 with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of sealing or 11 redaction from the court. 12 VIII. 13 FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE The Final Pretrial Conference is set for February 18, 2016, at 3:30 p.m. At least one of 14 the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial 15 Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable to 16 attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the 17 case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client. 18 Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final Pretrial 19 Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for 20 oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference statement by January 21 28, 2016. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the matters to be included 22 in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b), the parties 23 are to provide the court with the following: 24 25 26 - A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously tendered to the court and its resolution. - A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim. Disputed 27 core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not to identify 28 every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of each 5 1 claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered. Where 2 the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core 3 disputed facts in the above manner. - Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s motion in 4 5 6 limine. - Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal basis or theory underlying 7 their claims and defenses. Points of law should reflect issues derived from the core undisputed 8 and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument with any point of law; the parties may 9 include concise arguments in their trial briefs. 10 - A joint statement of the case in plain concise language, which will be read to the jury 11 during voir dire and at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint statement is to inform 12 the jury what the case is about. 13 - The parties’ position on the number of jurors to be impaneled to try the case. 14 Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include documents to 15 be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal. 16 The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to attach to the 17 Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they propose to offer 18 at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief statement of the nature of 19 the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each party may file separate lists. 20 These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial Conference Statement itself, 21 but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to the Final Pretrial Order. 22 Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed 23 alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for 24 plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be 25 marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds "ZZ" exhibits shall be 26 then listed as A-3, A-4, A-5 etc. All multi page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened 27 together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not include 28 excerpts of depositions to be used only for impeachment. In the event that plaintiff(s) and 6 1 defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation 2 the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that 3 all concerned, including the jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a 4 number and a letter. The parties are encouraged to consult concerning exhibits and, to the extent 5 possible, provide joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX- 6 1, JX-2. 7 The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of 8 witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the 9 standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a 10 party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes. 11 12 Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy, no later than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial. 13 14 Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds for sanctions. 15 The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil 16 Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the 17 formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b) 18 the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof 19 and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial Conference 20 Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these aims in mind.2 21 A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include monetary 22 sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as 23 the court deems appropriate. 24 Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, counsel shall 25 submit to chambers the word processable version of the Statement, in its entirety (including the 26 2 27 28 “If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may summarily dispose of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 86869 (9th Cir. 1985). 7 1 witness and exhibit lists) to: kjmorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 2 IX. TRIAL SETTING 3 The jury trial is set for April 4, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a trial length of 4 approximately 5-7 days. Trial briefs are due by March 21, 2016. 5 X. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 6 No settlement conference is currently scheduled. A settlement conference may be set at 7 the time of the Final Pretrial Conference or at an earlier time at the parties’ request. In the event 8 that an earlier settlement conference date or referral to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program 9 (VDRP) is requested, the parties shall file said request jointly, in writing. Because the case will 10 be tried to a jury, all parties should be prepared to advise the court whether they will stipulate to 11 the trial judge acting as settlement judge and waive disqualification by virtue thereof. 12 Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at any 13 Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. Each judge has 14 different requirements for the submission of settlement conference statements; the appropriate 15 instructions will be sent to you after the settlement judge is assigned. 16 XI. MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER 17 The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 18 Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court 19 upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation alone does not 20 constitute good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or 21 counsel does not constitute good cause. 22 XII. 23 24 OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order. 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 20, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 8

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?