Nguyen v. Kramer et al

Filing 5

SECOND ORDER Extending Time to File First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/19/15: Deadline EXTENDED to March 30, 2015. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

KNANH NGUYEN,

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,

1:14-cv-01510-AWI-GSA-PC
SECOND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

vs.
DEADLINE: MARCH 30, 2015
NORM KRAMER, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

Knanh Nguyen (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

17

with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Complaint commencing this

18

action was filed by Plaintiff and fifteen co-plaintiffs on June 18, 2014.

19

September 26, 2014, the court issued an order severing the plaintiffs’ claims, opening new

20

cases for the co-plaintiffs, and ordering Plaintiff and each co-plaintiff to file a First Amended

21

Complaint in his own action within thirty days.

22

was granted an extension of time until January 6, 2015 in which to file the First Amended

23

Complaint. (Doc. 4.)

(Doc. 2.)

On

(Doc. 1.) On November 26, 2014, Plaintiff

24

On December 12, 2014, Plaintiff and fifteen co-plaintiffs filed two appeals to the Ninth

25

Circuit court of appeals, which were assigned case numbers #14-17453 and #14-17456. (See

26

case 1:14-cv-00939-AWI-GSA-PC, Docs. 47, 48.) On January 12, 2015, the Ninth Circuit

27

dismissed the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. (Id., Doc. 53.) On February 5, 2015, the Ninth

28

Circuit entered the mandate. (Id., Doc. 54.)
1

1

Plaintiff’s appeals are now resolved, and Plaintiff is required to file a First Amended

2

Complaint in this case, pursuant to the court’s order of September 26, 2014. At this juncture,

3

good cause appearing, Plaintiff shall be granted an extension of time in which to file the First

4

Amended Complaint.

5

Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

6

1.

Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension of time until March 30, 2015, to file a First

7

Amended Complaint in this action, pursuant to the court’s order of September

8

26, 2014; and

9

2.

10

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order shall result in the dismissal of
this case.

11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 19, 2015

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28
2