Stell v. Kramer et al
Filing
5
SECOND ORDER EXTENDING Time to File First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/19/15. Amended Complaint Due by 3/30/2015. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MANUEL STELL,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
1:14-cv-01517-AWI-GSA-PC
SECOND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
vs.
DEADLINE: MARCH 30, 2015
NORM KRAMER, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Manuel Stell (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
17
with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Complaint commencing this
18
action was filed by Plaintiff and fifteen co-plaintiffs on June 18, 2014.
19
September 26, 2014, the court issued an order severing the plaintiffs’ claims, opening new
20
cases for the co-plaintiffs, and ordering Plaintiff and each co-plaintiff to file a First Amended
21
Complaint in his own action within thirty days.
22
was granted an extension of time until January 6, 2015 in which to file the First Amended
23
Complaint. (Doc. 4.)
(Doc. 2.)
On
(Doc. 1.) On November 26, 2014, Plaintiff
24
On December 12, 2014, Plaintiff and fifteen co-plaintiffs filed two appeals to the Ninth
25
Circuit court of appeals, which were assigned case numbers #14-17453 and #14-17456. (See
26
case 1:14-cv-00939-AWI-GSA-PC, Docs. 47, 48.) On January 12, 2015, the Ninth Circuit
27
dismissed the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. (Id., Doc. 53.) On February 5, 2015, the Ninth
28
Circuit entered the mandate. (Id., Doc. 54.)
1
1
Plaintiff’s appeals are now resolved, and Plaintiff is required to file a First Amended
2
Complaint in this case, pursuant to the court’s order of September 26, 2014. At this juncture,
3
good cause appearing, Plaintiff shall be granted an extension of time in which to file the First
4
Amended Complaint.
5
Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1.
Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension of time until March 30, 2015, to file a First
7
Amended Complaint in this action, pursuant to the court’s order of September
8
26, 2014; and
9
2.
10
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order shall result in the dismissal of
this case.
11
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 19, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?