Thompson v. Meyer-Zlokovich et al

Filing 20

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/21/2015. Twenty-One Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANDREW B. THOMPSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

MEYER-ZLOKOVICH, et al,

15

Defendants.

1:14-cv-01521-LJO-JLT (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Doc. 16)
21-DAY DEADLINE

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

17
18

' 1983. Plaintiff is proceeding on his claims in the Complaint against Defendants Correctional

19

Officers D. Meyers, Morrows, Moreno, and A. Rocha for use of deliberate indifference to

20

Plaintiff's safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment and for retaliation in violation of the First

21

Amendment. (Docs. 1, 9.)
On July 13, 2015, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment which included notice

22
23

to Plaintiff of the requirements if he desired to file an opposition. (Doc. 16.) Plaintiff has not

24

filed an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion despite lapse of the requisite

25

time. Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, the court ORDERS:
1.

26

within 21 days from the date of service of this order;1 and

27
28

Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion

1

A Second Informational Order containing the requirements to oppose a motion for summary judgment issued earlier

1

1

2.

Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result
dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

2
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 21, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

this month. (See Doc. 18.)

2