Johnson v. Sweeney et al
Filing
54
ORDER Directing Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's Pending Motions to Compel within Twenty-One Days from the Date of Service of this Order and Granting Plaintiff's Fifteen Days to File a Reply signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/01/2016. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON,
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
SWEENEY, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01526-DAD-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S PENDING
MOTIONS TO COMPEL WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS
ORDER AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF FIFTEEN
DAYS TO FILE A REPLY
[ECF No. 46]
14
Plaintiff Vance Edward Johnson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
15
16
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On January 29, 2016, the Court granted Defendants’ request to extend the time to file a
17
18
response to Plaintiff’s pending motions to compel to twenty-one (21) days from the final order on
19
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
20
On July 29, 2016, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted in part and denied
21
in part. Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants
22
shall file a response to Plaintiff’s pending motions to compel, and within fifteen (15) days from the
23
date Defendants filed their response, Plaintiff may file a reply.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
27
August 1, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?