U.S. Bank National Association vs. Bellinger
Filing
11
ORDER Striking Document Field on October 14, 2014, 10 as Duplicative of Documents in Docket Entry #1, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/15/14. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
13
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
AS TRUSTEE FOR CREDIT SUISSE
FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE
SECURITIES CORP, CSMC
MORTGAGE-BACKED PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-4,
ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT FILED
ON OCTOBER 14, 2014 (Doc 10) AS
DUPLICATIVE OF DOCUMENTS IN
DOCKET ENTRY #1
Plaintiff,
v.
MARK BELLINGER,
Defendant.
14
/
15
16
Case No. 1: 14-cv-1538-JAM-BAM
Defendant Mark Bellinger (“Defendant”), proceeding pro se, filed this “removal” action on
17
September 2, 2014. (Doc. 1.) The Court then directed Defendant to submit his filing fee for this action.
18
(Doc. 8.) In the meantime, this Court issued Findings and Recommendations on October 2, 2014
19
finding that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this unlawful detainer action, and therefore
20
recommending this case be remanded to the Calaveras County Superior Court. (Doc. 9.) Defendant
21
filed his filing fees on October 14, 2014. At the time defendant submitted his filing fee, he submitted
22
a “Notice of Removal.” (Doc. 10.) The Court has reviewed this Notice of Removal and finds that the
23
substance of the documents are duplicative of the Notice of Removal already on file with the Court
24
and filed at Docket entry 1. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the “Notice of Removal”
25
filed on October 14, 2014 (Doc. 10) is STRICKEN from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
October 15, 2014
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?