Cohea v. Tucker et al

Filing 11

ORDER DISMISSING CASE, signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/10/15. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DANNY JAMES COHEA,
Case No. 1:14-cv-01544-RRB
Plaintiff,
DISMISSAL ORDER
vs.
H. TUCKER, et al.,
Defendants.

On June 22, 2015, the Court entered its Order vacating its prior order granting
Plaintiff Danny James Cohea leave to proceed in forma pauperis.1 On July 13, 2015, the
Court denied reconsideration of its June 22, 2015, Order, and granted Plaintiff through and
including August 7, 2015, within which to pay the filing fee.2 In its July 13 Order the Court
warned Plaintiff that the failure to comply with that Order could result in dismissal of this
action without further notice. To date Plaintiff has failed and refused to comply with the
Court’s July 13, 2015, Order.
Accordingly, the Complaint of file herein is hereby DISMISSED.3
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th of September, 2015.
S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Docket 8.

2

Docket 10.

3

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986–87 (9th
Cir. 1999).
DISMISSAL ORDER