Mugridge vs. Broten et al
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/7/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Layne Hayden #230478
3805 N. West Ave.
Fresno, California 93705
Telephone (559) 264-4500
Facsimile (559) 264-4842
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff, David Mugridge
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
*****
11
DAVID MUGRIDGE,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
JUN BI HAWKINS, ET AL.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION; ORDER
//
18
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01552-SMS
//
19
//
20
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
28
//
Mugridge v. Jun Bi Hawkins, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
1
Case no. 1:14-cv-01552
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff David Mugridge and Defendants
1
2
3
4
5
Linda Broten, trustee of the Linda Broten Separate Property Declaration of Trust, dated
10/7/2009, Jerilyn M. Weber, trustee of the Weber Trust dated 1/20/2011 and Jun Bi Hawkins,
individually and dba Manyi Massage, constituting all the parties in this action, by and through
their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the
above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
6
7
Dated: January 5, 2015
/s/ Layne Hayden
Layne Hayden, Attorney for Plaintiff,
David Mugridge
Date: January 5, 2015
/s/ Bruce A. Neilson
Bruce A. Neilson, Attorney for Defendants,
Linda Broten, trustee, Jerilyn M. Weber,
trustee and Jun Bi Hawkins, individually and
dba Manyi Massage
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
ORDER
16
The parties having so stipulated,
17
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
January 7, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Mugridge v. Jun Bi Hawkins, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; Order
2
Case no. 1:14-cv-01552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?