Mugridge vs. Broten et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/7/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Layne Hayden #230478 3805 N. West Ave. Fresno, California 93705 Telephone (559) 264-4500 Facsimile (559) 264-4842 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff, David Mugridge 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ***** 11 DAVID MUGRIDGE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 JUN BI HAWKINS, ET AL., 15 Defendants. 16 17 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER // 18 CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01552-SMS // 19 // 20 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 28 // Mugridge v. Jun Bi Hawkins, et al. Stipulation for Dismissal; Order 1 Case no. 1:14-cv-01552 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff David Mugridge and Defendants 1 2 3 4 5 Linda Broten, trustee of the Linda Broten Separate Property Declaration of Trust, dated 10/7/2009, Jerilyn M. Weber, trustee of the Weber Trust dated 1/20/2011 and Jun Bi Hawkins, individually and dba Manyi Massage, constituting all the parties in this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 6 7 Dated: January 5, 2015 /s/ Layne Hayden Layne Hayden, Attorney for Plaintiff, David Mugridge Date: January 5, 2015 /s/ Bruce A. Neilson Bruce A. Neilson, Attorney for Defendants, Linda Broten, trustee, Jerilyn M. Weber, trustee and Jun Bi Hawkins, individually and dba Manyi Massage 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 The parties having so stipulated, 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill January 7, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mugridge v. Jun Bi Hawkins, et al. Stipulation for Dismissal; Order 2 Case no. 1:14-cv-01552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?