Davis v. Molina et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Denying Plaintiff's 9 Request for Default Judgment signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 01/05/2014. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

Case No. 1:14-cv-01554 LJO DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT
JUDGMENT

v.
A. MOLINA, et al.,

[ECF Nos. 7, 8, 9]
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff Charles T. Davis, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action

18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 2, 2014. The matter was referred to a United States
19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20

On December 15, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that

21 recommended Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be DENIED.

The Findings and

22 Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be
23 filed within fourteen (14) days. On December 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed objections.
24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

25 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file including Plaintiff’s
26 objections, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record
27 and by proper analysis.
28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1

1 1.

The Findings and Recommendations filed December 15, 2014, are ADOPTED in full;

2 2.

Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is DENIED; and

3 3.

The matter is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

January 5, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2