Edward Ronje v. King et al

Filing 25

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION without Prejudice as Barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 478-88 (1994), signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 08/31/2016. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

EDWARD RONJE,

8
9
10

Plaintiff,
v.
KING, et al.,

11

Case No. 1:14-cv-01589-LJO-JLT (PC)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE AS BARRED BY Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477, 478-88 (1994)
(Doc. 23)

Defendants.

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff, Edward Ronje, is a civil detainee who is currently proceeding pro se and in
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action
on October 10, 2014. (Doc. 1.) Upon initial review, it was discovered that Plaintiff was

16

challenging the assessment protocol which resulted in his civil detention. Thus, the action was

17

dismissed as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487-88 (1994). (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff

18

appealed and the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and vacated and remanded for dismissal to be

19

entered without prejudice. (Docs. 23, 24.)

20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice as

21

barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487-88 (1994).

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

August 31, 2016

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1