State of California v. Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians of California
Filing
59
ORDER to continue the Scheduling Conference to 2/24/2015 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/30/2014. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
SARA J. DRAKE
Senior Assistant Attorney General
WILLIAM L. WILLIAMS, JR., State Bar No. 99581
Deputy Attorney General
WILLIAM P. TORNGREN, State Bar No. 58493
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 323-3033
Fax: (916) 327-2319
E-mail: William.Torngren@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff State of California
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
(FRESNO DIVISION)
12
13
14
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
15
16
v.
Case No. 1:14-CV-01593 LJO SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER RESCHEDULING
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE TO FEBRUARY 24, 2015
17
18
19
PICAYUNE RANCHERIA OF
CHUKCHANSI INDIANS OF
CALIFORNIA, A FEDERALLY
RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE,
20
Defendant.
21
22
The State of California (State) requested that the Court reschedule the Mandatory
23
Scheduling Conference, and concomitant deadlines, from January 23, 2015, until a date in the
24
latter part of February 2015.
25
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Court grants the State’s request and orders:
26
1.
The Mandatory Scheduling Conference presently set for January 23, 2015, at 9:00
27
a.m., is rescheduled to February 24, 2015, at 2:30 p.m., in Courtroom Nine before the Honorable
28
Stanley A. Boone.
1
1
2
2.
The Court’s Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference, ECF 4 (Oct. 10,
2014), shall otherwise remain in full force and effect.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 30, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?