Harper v. County of Kern et al

Filing 50

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/15/2016 ORDERING defendants Pafford, Allen and Norris DISMISSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 4 THERESA A. GOLDNER, COUNTY COUNSEL STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN Andrew C. Thomson, Deputy (SBN 149057) 1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone: 661-868-3800 Facsimile: 661-868-3805 5 Attorneys for Defendant County of Kern, 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ALEXANDER F. HARPER, an individual ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) COUN TY OF KERN, a municipal entity, ) CYNTHIA NORRIS, an individual, ) MELISSA ALLEN, an individual, MARK ) PAFFORD, an individual, and DOES 1 ) through 10, inclusive, ) Defendants. ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:14-CV-01603-TLN-MJS CORRECTED STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS NORRIS, ALLEN AND PAFFORD; ORDER TRIAL DATE: Previously Vacated 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 COME NOW the Parties to this matter, Plaintiff ALEXANDER F. HARPER (hereinafter “Plaintiff” and/or “Harper”) through his counsel of record Jennifer A. Bandlow, of The Cochran Firm – California, and Defendants CYNTHIA NORRIS (hereinafter “Norris”), MARK PAFFORD (hereinafter “Pafford”), and MELISSA ALLEN (hereinafter “Allen”), (hereinafter Norris, Pafford and Allen are collectively identified as “Defendants”) through their counsel of record Andrew C. Thomson of the Office of Kern County Counsel, (hereinafter Defendants and Plaintiff are collectively referred to herein as the "Parties") and provide as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties to this action through their 27 designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as 28 to any complaint, allegation and/or cause of action against Defendants, more specifically the 1 Corrected STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS NORRIS, ALLEN AND PAFFORD 1 dismissal of the entire applicable complaint of Plaintiff Harper as against Defendants Pafford, 2 Allen and Norris. 3 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the aforementioned dismissal is in consideration 4 of a resolution of the matter by the Parties, and that each party hereby agrees to bear all of their 5 own costs and attorney’s fees with respect to this litigation. 6 7 Dated: September 12, 2016 THE COCHRAN FIRM – CALIFORNIA 8 By /s/ Jennifer A. Bandlow Jennifer A. Bandlow, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Harper 9 10 _ 11 Dated: September 12, 2016 OFFICE OF KERN COUNTY COUNSEL 12 By /s/Andrew C. Thomson _ Andrew C. Thomson, Deputy Attorneys for Defendants Allen, Norris, Pafford 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 15, 2016 20 21 22 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Corrected STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS NORRIS, ALLEN AND PAFFORD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?