Harper v. County of Kern et al

Filing 50

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/15/2016 ORDERING defendants Pafford, Allen and Norris DISMISSED. (Zignago, K.)

1

4

THERESA A. GOLDNER, COUNTY COUNSEL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN
Andrew C. Thomson, Deputy (SBN 149057)
1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 661-868-3805

5

Attorneys for Defendant County of Kern,

2
3

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

ALEXANDER F. HARPER, an individual )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
COUN TY OF KERN, a municipal entity, )
CYNTHIA NORRIS, an individual,
)
MELISSA ALLEN, an individual, MARK )
PAFFORD, an individual, and DOES 1
)
through 10, inclusive,
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:14-CV-01603-TLN-MJS
CORRECTED STIPULATION FOR
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS NORRIS,
ALLEN AND PAFFORD; ORDER

TRIAL DATE: Previously Vacated

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

COME NOW the Parties to this matter, Plaintiff ALEXANDER F. HARPER
(hereinafter “Plaintiff” and/or “Harper”) through his counsel of record Jennifer A. Bandlow, of
The Cochran Firm – California, and Defendants CYNTHIA NORRIS (hereinafter “Norris”),
MARK PAFFORD (hereinafter “Pafford”), and MELISSA ALLEN (hereinafter “Allen”),
(hereinafter Norris, Pafford and Allen are collectively identified as “Defendants”) through their
counsel of record Andrew C. Thomson of the Office of Kern County Counsel, (hereinafter
Defendants and Plaintiff are collectively referred to herein as the "Parties") and provide as
follows:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties to this action through their

27

designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as

28

to any complaint, allegation and/or cause of action against Defendants, more specifically the
1
Corrected STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS NORRIS, ALLEN AND PAFFORD

1

dismissal of the entire applicable complaint of Plaintiff Harper as against Defendants Pafford,

2

Allen and Norris.

3

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the aforementioned dismissal is in consideration

4

of a resolution of the matter by the Parties, and that each party hereby agrees to bear all of their

5

own costs and attorney’s fees with respect to this litigation.

6
7

Dated: September 12, 2016

THE COCHRAN FIRM – CALIFORNIA

8
By /s/ Jennifer A. Bandlow
Jennifer A. Bandlow, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Harper

9
10

_

11
Dated: September 12, 2016

OFFICE OF KERN COUNTY COUNSEL

12
By /s/Andrew C. Thomson
_
Andrew C. Thomson, Deputy
Attorneys for Defendants Allen, Norris, Pafford

13
14
15
16

ORDER

17
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 15, 2016

20
21
22

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Corrected STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS NORRIS, ALLEN AND PAFFORD