Harper v. County of Kern et al

Filing 52

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/19/16 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety as to any complaint, allegation and/or cause of action against Defendants, more specifically the dism issal of the entire applicable complaint of Plaintiff Harper as against Defendant County of Kern that the aforementioned dismissal is in consideration of a resolution of the matter by the Parties, and that each party hereby agrees to bear all of its/their own costs and attorney's fees with respect to this litigation. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)

1

4

THERESA A. GOLDNER, COUNTY COUNSEL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN
Andrew C. Thomson, Deputy (SBN 149057)
1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 661-868-3805

5

Attorneys for Defendant County of Kern,

2
3

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

ALEXANDER F. HARPER, an individual )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
COUN TY OF KERN, a municipal entity, )
CYNTHIA NORRIS, an individual,
)
MELISSA ALLEN, an individual, MARK )
PAFFORD, an individual, and DOES 1
)
through 10, inclusive,
)
Defendants.
)
)

CASE NO. 1:14-CV-01603-TLN-MJS
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT COUNTY OF KERN;
ORDER

TRIAL DATE: Previously Vacated

18

COME NOW the Parties to this matter, Plaintiff ALEXANDER F. HARPER

19

(hereinafter “Plaintiff” and/or “Harper”) through his counsel of record Jennifer A. Bandlow, of

20

The Cochran Firm – California, and Defendant COUNTY OF KERN (hereinafter “Defendant”

21

and/or “County”) through their counsel of record Andrew C. Thomson of the Office of Kern

22

County Counsel, (hereinafter Defendant and Plaintiff are collectively referred to herein as the

23

"Parties") and provide as follows:

24

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties to this action through

25

their designated counsel, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its

26

entirety as to any complaint, allegation and/or cause of action against Defendants, more

27

specifically the dismissal of the entire applicable complaint of Plaintiff Harper as against

28

Defendant County of Kern.
1
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF KERN

1

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the aforementioned dismissal is in

2

consideration of a resolution of the matter by the Parties, and that each party hereby agrees to

3

bear all of its/their own costs and attorney’s fees with respect to this litigation.

4
5

Dated: September 12, 2016

THE COCHRAN FIRM - CALIFORNIA

6
By

7

/s/ Jennifer A. Bandlow_____________
Jennifer A. Bandlow, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Harper

8
9
Dated: September 12, 2016

OFFICE OF KERN COUNTY COUNSEL

10
By

11
12

/s/ Andrew C. Thomson______________________
Andrew C. Thomson, Deputy
Attorneys for Defendant County of Kern

13
14

ORDER

15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

Dated: September 19, 2016

19
20

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF KERN