Quair, Sr. v. Vento et al
Filing
30
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 29 Motion for Stay of Proceedings, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/17/16. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SAMMY R. QUAIR, SR.,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
v.
VENTO, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01616-BAM (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
(ECF No. 29)
Plaintiff Sammy R. Quair, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) is state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
18
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction
19
of a United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 7.) This action concerns events that occurred while he
20
was a pretrial detainee in the Kings County Jail.
21
On May 10, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to stay all proceedings in this matter until May 18,
22
2016, because he expects to be released on parole on that date. (ECF No. 29.) He further states that he
23
plans to inform the Court of his new mailing address.
24
Plaintiff’s motion is denied. This action is currently in the screening stage, and the Court will
25
screen his amended complaint in due course. Plaintiff appears to be concerned about missing mail
26
from the Court related to this case while he is in the parole process. The Court does not expect to issue
27
a screening order on or before May 18, 2016 in this matter. Nevertheless, Plaintiff should promptly
28
inform the Court of his new address, as required by the Local Rules, so that he does not miss any
1
1
communications pertaining to this matter. Plaintiff is further informed that he has nothing due at this
2
time.
3
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to stay (ECF No. 29), is
DENIED.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
May 17, 2016
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?