Quair, Sr. v. Vento et al

Filing 30

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 29 Motion for Stay of Proceedings, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/17/16. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMMY R. QUAIR, SR., 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. VENTO, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:14-cv-01616-BAM (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS (ECF No. 29) Plaintiff Sammy R. Quair, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) is state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction 19 of a United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 7.) This action concerns events that occurred while he 20 was a pretrial detainee in the Kings County Jail. 21 On May 10, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to stay all proceedings in this matter until May 18, 22 2016, because he expects to be released on parole on that date. (ECF No. 29.) He further states that he 23 plans to inform the Court of his new mailing address. 24 Plaintiff’s motion is denied. This action is currently in the screening stage, and the Court will 25 screen his amended complaint in due course. Plaintiff appears to be concerned about missing mail 26 from the Court related to this case while he is in the parole process. The Court does not expect to issue 27 a screening order on or before May 18, 2016 in this matter. Nevertheless, Plaintiff should promptly 28 inform the Court of his new address, as required by the Local Rules, so that he does not miss any 1 1 communications pertaining to this matter. Plaintiff is further informed that he has nothing due at this 2 time. 3 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to stay (ECF No. 29), is DENIED. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara May 17, 2016 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?