Quair, Sr. v. Vento et al
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Obey a Court Order, Failure to State a Claim, and Failure to Prosecute 32 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/3/17: 20-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAMMY R. QUAIR, SR.,
Case No. 1:14-cv-01616-AWI-BAM (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT
ORDER, FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM,
AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
(ECF No. 32)
VENTO, et al.,
TWENTY (20) DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Sammy R. Quair, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and
in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action
on October 16, 2014. (ECF No. 1.)
On November 16, 2016, the Court issued a screening order dismissing Plaintiff’s first
amended complaint with leave to amend within thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 32.) The Court
expressly warned Plaintiff that the failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with the
Court’s order would result in this action being dismissed for failure to obey a court order and
failure to state a claim. (Id. at 6.) The deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint has
expired, and he has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order.
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff shall show cause in writing,
within twenty (20) days of service of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s November 16, 2016 order, for failure to state a
claim, and for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff can comply with this order to show cause by filing a
second amended complaint. The failure to respond to this order will result in the dismissal of
this action, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim, failure to obey a court order, and
failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 3, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?