DiGiantomasso et al v. Tulare County et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER RE Response to Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/20/2014. (Martinez, A)

1
2
3
4
5

Nancy E. Hudgins, SBN 85222
Matthew M. Grigg, SBN 195951
Carol B. Ho, SBN 286972
LAW OFFICES OF NANCY E. HUDGINS
711 Van Ness Ave., Ste 450
San Francisco, CA 94102
415-979-0100
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendants Harold Orr, M.D., Corizon Health, Inc., and Beatriz Camberos, L.V.N.
Michael J. Haddad, SBN 189114
Julia Sherwin, SBN 189268
Genevieve Guertin, SBN 262479
T. Kennedy Helm, SBN 282319
HADDAD & SHERWIN
505 Seventeenth Street
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

LAURIE DIGIANTOMASSO, et al.
Plaintiffs,

17
18
19
20

vs.
TULARE COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.

21
22

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/

Case No.: 14-cv-01633-GSA
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE.
RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

23
24

The parties stipulate and agree that the Law Offices of Nancy E. Hudgins agrees to accept

25

service by email of the complaint on behalf of Defendants Harold Orr, M.D., Corizon Health,

26

Inc., and Beatriz Camberos, L.V.N. The parties further stipulate and agree that these

27

Defendants need not respond to Plaintiffs’ initially filed complaint and instead will respond to

28

Plaintiffs’ forthcoming first amended complaint within 21 days of emailed service to defense
counsel. Plaintiffs will file the first amended complaint no later than December 17, 2014.
DiGiantomasso, et al. v. Tulare County, et al.
Stipulation and Order Re Response to Complaint
14k12

1

Case No. 14-cv-1633-GSA
DiGiantomasso/p/StipReComplaint/order

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

3
4

DATED: November 12, 2014

5

/s/ Carol B. Ho
NANCY E. HUDGINS
MATTHEW M. GRIGG
CAROL B. HO
Attorneys for Defendants Defendants Harold Orr,
M.D., Corizon Health, Inc., and Beatriz Camberos,
L.V.N.

6
7
8
9
10

LAW OFFICES OF NANCY E. HUDGINS

DATED: November 12, 2014

11

HADDAD & SHERWIN
/s/ Julia Sherwin
JULIA SHERWIN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

12
13

*Plaintiffs’ counsel have consented to e-signing this
document.

14
15
16

ORDER

17

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, the above-named Defendants need not respond to

18

Plaintiffs’ complaint filed on October 17, 2014. Doc. 1. Plaintiffs shall file an amended

19

complaint no later than December 17, 2014; and the above-named Defendants shall file a

20

responsive pleading within 21 days of service of the amended complaint via the Court’s

21

CM/ECF system and/or email to Defendants’ counsel.

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 20, 2014

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

DiGiantomasso, et al. v. Tulare County, et al.
Stipulation and Order Re Response to Complaint
14k12

2

Case No. 14-cv-1633-GSA
DiGiantomasso/p/StipReComplaint/order