DiGiantomasso et al v. Tulare County et al
Filing
67
STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/4/2015. (Martinez, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
James J. Arendt, Esq.
Bar No. 142937
Brande L. Gustafson, Esq.
Bar No. 267130
Weakley & Arendt, LLP
1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176
Fresno, California 93710
Telephone: (559) 221-5256
Facsimile: (559) 221-5262
James@walaw-fresno.com
Brande@walaw-fresno.com
Attorneys for Defendants, County of Kings, Sheriff David Robinson, Commander Kim
Pedreiro, and Sgt. Sheri Henderson
Michael J. Haddad, SBN 189114
Julia Sherwin, SBN 189268
Genevieve Guertin, SBN 262479
T. Kennedy Helm, SBN 282319
HADDAD & SHERWIN, LLP
505 Seventeenth Street
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 452-5500
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Peter G. Bertling #131602
Jemma Parker Saunders #227962
BERTLING & CLAUSEN L.L.P.
15 West Carrillo Street, Suite 100
Santa Barbara, California 93101
Telephone: (805) 892-2100
Facsimile: (805) 963-6044
pgb@bertling-clausen.com
jps@bertling-clausen.com
Attorneys for Defendants California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., Taylor Fithian, M.D.,
Megan Nabors, L.V.N., Danielle Ecker, Linda Weesner, R.N., Minetta Costa, R.N., and Jana
Cerarley, L.P.T.
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
23
LAURIE DIGIANTOMASSO, et al.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
24
25
26
27
vs.
TULARE COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
28
Stipulation & Protective Order
1
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01633-MCE-GSA
STIPULATION AND
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Complaint Filed: October 17, 2014
Trial Date: March 13, 2017
1
In the above captioned case, Laurie DiGiantomasso v. Tulare County, et al., U.S.D.C.
2
(E.D. Cal.) No. 1:14-cv-01633-MCE-GSA (“the Action”), Plaintiffs Laurie DiGiantomasso,
3
Randy DiGiantomasso, and Shaymus DiGiantomasso, Deceased (“Plaintiffs”); County of
4
Kings, Sheriff David Robinson, Commander Kim Pedreiro, and Sergeant Shari Henderson
5
(“County Defendants”), California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., Taylor Fithian, M.D., Megan
6
Nabors, L.V.N., Danielle Ecker, Linda Weesner, R.N., Minetta Costa, R.N., and Jana Cerarley,
7
L.P.T. (“CFMG Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), agree that discovery and informal
8
discovery in this action is likely to involve production of private, proprietary, or security-
9
sensitive information for which protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose
10
other than this litigation may be warranted. As a result, the Parties seek to facilitate the
11
exchange of information and documents which may be subject to confidentiality limitations on
12
disclosure due to federal laws, state laws, and constitutional privacy rights.
13
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties by and
14
through their respective counsel of record, that they jointly request, pursuant to Rule 26(c) of
15
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the Court enter this [Proposed] Protective Order as an
16
Order of the Court, as follows:
17
1.
For purposes of this Stipulation and Protective Order, CONFIDENTIAL
18
INFORMATION means any document, information, or tangible thing, electronic recording or
19
transcript of oral testimony, whether or not made under oath, or any portion of such a document,
20
thing, recording, or transcript, designated by any party as “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION”
21
because it contains (a) proprietary information (trade secret, proprietary matter, or other
22
confidential research, development, or commercial information as those terms are used in
23
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26), (b) security-sensitive information that if released to the
24
public or inmate population may compromise the safety and security of a correctional facility,
25
(c) confidential personal information, such that the party making the designation avers that it
26
can and would make a showing to the Court sufficient to justify the filing of the document or
27
information under seal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Local Rule
28
141, and controlling federal case law, or (d) information reasonably believed to be protected
Stipulation & Protective Order
2
1
2
from disclosure pursuant to state or federal law.
2.
By way of example, the term “documents” includes but is not limited to
3
operations records, institutional records, medical records, policy and procedure manuals,
4
training materials, correspondence, emails, memoranda, or other printed or electronic matter,
5
interoffice and/or intra-corporate communications, letters, statements, contracts, invoices,
6
drafts, charts, maps, diagrams, video, photographs, medical records, institutional records,
7
personnel files, work sheets, desk diaries, recordings, specifications, compilations from which
8
information can be obtained and translated as required through detection devices into
9
reasonably usable form, sketches, drawings, notes (including laboratory notebooks and records),
10
disclosures, data, reports, work assignments, instructions, and other writings. By way of
11
example, and not limitation, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may include or be included in
12
simulations, animations, computer programs and software, magnetic or digital discs,
13
electronically recorded tapes of any sort, summaries, notes, abstracts, motions, drawings,
14
videos, photographs, and any instrument that comprises, embodies, or summarizes otherwise
15
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
16
3.
During the Action, the Parties may produce certain documents pursuant to
17
discovery requests, agreement, or in connection with the retention of experts. At the time of
18
production, the producing party will designate the documents or portions thereof that they deem
19
to contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. Only documents or portions thereof marked as
20
“CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” will be subject to this Stipulation and Protective Order.
21
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION will not be disseminated or produced except in accordance
22
with this Stipulation and Protective Order. By designating a document or portion thereof as
23
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, the party making the designation avers that it can and
24
would make a showing to the Court sufficient to justify the filing of the document or portion
25
thereof under seal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Local Rule 141,
26
and controlling federal case law.
27
28
4.
The designation of a document or portion thereof as CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION shall be made, whenever possible prior to production, by placing or affixing
Stipulation & Protective Order
3
1
on each page of such material in a manner that will not interfere with its legibility the words
2
“CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.” If such designation is not possible prior to the
3
production, the designation must be made in writing by the producing party, and replacement
4
documents bearing the “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” designation shall be provided as
5
soon as practicable. In the event that documents subject to confidentiality, or portions thereof,
6
are inadvertently produced without being designated CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, they
7
shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION as of the date of designation.
8
5.
Counsel for any party retains the right to challenge the designation of a particular
9
document or portion thereof as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. The burden of proof with
10
respect to the propriety or correctness of the designation of any document or portion thereof as
11
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION will rest on the designating party. If any party believes any
12
designation of a document or portion thereof as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION is
13
inappropriate, the Parties will meet and confer and attempt to resolve the issue on an expedited
14
basis. If the Parties are unable to mutually agree on a resolution, the Parties will seek
15
appropriate Court intervention, including a request for a discovery conference or call with the
16
Judge, and where appropriate, submit the documents to the Judge under seal to determine
17
whether and to what extent such documents or portions thereof should be deemed
18
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION in accordance with Paragraphs 1 and 3 of this Protective
19
Order. Specifically, the Judge shall determine whether the party seeking to designate
20
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION has satisfied the requirements for filing the document or
21
portion thereof sought to be designated under seal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil
22
Procedure 26(c), Local Rule 141, and controlling federal case law. Where requested or
23
permitted by the Court, the Parties may provide the Court with separate statements containing
24
the challenges by the party opposing the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION designation and
25
the justifications by the party designating the documents or portions thereof as
26
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
27
28
6.
Whenever a deposition or court proceeding involves the disclosure of a party’s
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, the following procedure will apply:
Stipulation & Protective Order
4
1
a.
The court reporter will be directed to bind those portions of the transcript
2
containing CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION separately. This request will be made on the
3
record whenever possible.
4
b.
The cover of any portion of a deposition or court proceeding transcript
5
that contains testimony or documentary evidence that has been designated CONFIDENTIAL
6
INFORMATION will be prominently marked:
7
CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
8
9
10
c.
All portions of deposition or court proceeding transcripts designated as
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION will be sealed and will not be disseminated except to the
persons identified in Paragraph 10.
7.
11
Any party may designate a deposition or portion thereof as CONFIDENTIAL
12
INFORMATION and subject to the Protective Order during or for a reasonable time after the
13
deposition. If a party intends to designate portions of a deposition as “CONFIDENTIAL” that
14
party shall have the right to limit attendance at the relevant portion of the deposition to the
15
persons set forth in Paragraph 10 of this Order. For all pleadings that contain CONFIDENTIAL
16
INFORMATION, the filing party shall seek leave of court to file under seal consistent with the
17
Local Rules for the Eastern District of California. With leave of court, an unredacted version
18
will be filed under seal with the Clerk of the Court, and pleadings containing CONFIDENTIAL
19
INFORMATION will be filed in a sealed envelope prominently marked with the caption of this
20
case, the identity of the party filing the envelope, and the notation:
21
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
22
THIS ENVELOPE IS NOT TO BE OPENED NOR THE CONTENTS DISPLAYED,
23
COPIED, OR REVEALED, EXCEPT BY COURT ORDER
24
Counsel for parties agree to accept service copies of sealed pleadings by email and first-class
25
mail.
26
8.
Upon a failure of the filing party to file personal, security, or proprietary
27
information under seal, any party may request that the Court place the document under seal. The
28
procedures of Local Rule 141 shall be followed.
Stipulation & Protective Order
5
1
9.
Either party may challenge the designation of a deposition transcript, or a portion
2
thereof, as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, under the procedure set forth in paragraph 5,
3
above.
4
10.
Unless otherwise provided in this Order, and subject to the provisions of
5
Paragraph 11, access to CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION will be restricted to the Court, its
6
officers, court personnel and stenographic parties engaged in proceedings in this matter,
7
Plaintiff and Defense experts, and Plaintiff and Defense counsel (defined herein to include:
8
attorneys in this action and their support staff, including copy services, investigators,
9
consultants, paralegals, legal interns, and legal assistants), and other testifying or consulting
10
experts, where production is required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or where
11
production is ordered by the Court. Any attorney, the attorney’s support staff or expert to
12
whom disclosure is made will be furnished with a copy of the Protective Order and will be
13
subject to the Order. Nothing in this Protective Order will preclude Plaintiffs’ counsel from
14
reviewing with the Plaintiffs, decedent’s jail medical and/or custody records.
15
11.
The Parties agree that CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION subject to this
16
Protective Order shall be used solely for the purposes of this litigation, and in no other
17
litigation, except as unsealed by the Court or filed in the public record in this action.
18
12.
Within thirty (30) days of the conclusion of the litigation of this action, all
19
material marked as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION under this Confidentiality Agreement
20
and not received in evidence shall be returned to the producing Party or third party, unless the
21
Parties agree that the material may be destroyed instead of being returned, in which instance
22
counsel shall certify that the documents have been destroyed. The designating party may request
23
that the Clerk of the Court return to the producing Party or third party, or destroy, any sealed
24
material and/or CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION used as evidence at the end of the
25
litigation, including appeals. This Confidentiality Agreement shall survive the discontinuance or
26
other resolution of the action.
27
28
13.
As far as the provisions of any protective orders entered in this action restrict the
communication and use of the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION produced thereunder, such
Stipulation & Protective Order
6
1
orders shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of this litigation, except that there shall
2
be no restriction on documents that are used as exhibits in Court unless such exhibits were or
3
should have been filed under seal.
4
14.
Nothing in this Stipulation and Protective Order precludes Plaintiffs or
5
Defendants from seeking and obtaining, on an appropriate showing, additional protection with
6
respect to the confidentiality of documents or portions thereof, or relief from the Protective
7
Order.
8
9
15.
Each person designated in Paragraph 10, by receiving and reading a copy of the
Protective Order entered by the Court as part of this Stipulation and Protective Order, agrees to
10
abide by its provisions and to see that its provisions are known and adhered to by those under
11
his or her supervision or control, and to submit to the jurisdiction of the Court in the event the
12
Protective Order is breached.
13
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16
DATE: September 1, 2015
HADDAD & SHERWIN, LLP
17
18
By:
19
20
21
/s/ T. Kennedy Helm (as authorized on 9/01/15)
Michael J. Haddad
Julia Sherwin
Genevieve K. Guertin
T. Kennedy Helm
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
22
23
DATE: September 1, 2015
WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP
24
25
By:
26
27
28
Stipulation & Protective Order
7
/s/ Brande L. Gustafson
James J. Arendt
Brande L. Gustafson
Attorneys for Defendants County of Kings,
Sheriff David Robinson, Commander Kim
Pedreiro, and Sgt. Sheri Henderson
.
1
2
DATE: September 2, 2015
3
BERTLING & CLAUSEN, LLP
By:
4
5
6
7
8
/s/ Jemma Parker Saunders (as authorized on
9/02/15)
Peter G. Bertling
Jemma Parker Saunders
Attorneys for Defendants
California Forensic Medical Group, Inc.,
Taylor Fithian, M.D., Megan Nabors, L.V.N.,
Danielle Ecker, Linda Weesner, R.N., Minetta
Costa, R.N., and Jana Cerarley, L.P.T.
9
10
ORDER
The Court adopts the parties’ foregoing stipulated protective order with the following
11
12
13
exceptions:
14
15
The Court declines to adopt page 4, lines 19-26. To the extent motion practice is
required, the parties shall comply with Local Rules 141 and 251.
The Court declines to adopt page 5, lines 17-23 (beginning with the line “With leave of
16
court . . . “). Any request to file documents under seal shall follow the guidelines set
17
forth under Local Rule 141.
18
19
20
The Court declines to adopt page 6, lines 22-26 (beginning with the line “The
designating party . . .”).
The Court declines to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of the protective
21
order after the action has been closed, as requested under paragraph 13. See Local Rule
22
141.1(f).
23
The Court retains the discretion to determine the appropriate mechanism(s) for the resolution of
24
any disputes arising out of the stipulated protective order.
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 4, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
Stipulation & Protective Order
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?