DiGiantomasso et al v. Tulare County et al

Filing 67

STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/4/2015. (Martinez, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 James J. Arendt, Esq. Bar No. 142937 Brande L. Gustafson, Esq. Bar No. 267130 Weakley & Arendt, LLP 1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176 Fresno, California 93710 Telephone: (559) 221-5256 Facsimile: (559) 221-5262 James@walaw-fresno.com Brande@walaw-fresno.com Attorneys for Defendants, County of Kings, Sheriff David Robinson, Commander Kim Pedreiro, and Sgt. Sheri Henderson Michael J. Haddad, SBN 189114 Julia Sherwin, SBN 189268 Genevieve Guertin, SBN 262479 T. Kennedy Helm, SBN 282319 HADDAD & SHERWIN, LLP 505 Seventeenth Street Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 452-5500 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Peter G. Bertling #131602 Jemma Parker Saunders #227962 BERTLING & CLAUSEN L.L.P. 15 West Carrillo Street, Suite 100 Santa Barbara, California 93101 Telephone: (805) 892-2100 Facsimile: (805) 963-6044 pgb@bertling-clausen.com jps@bertling-clausen.com Attorneys for Defendants California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., Taylor Fithian, M.D., Megan Nabors, L.V.N., Danielle Ecker, Linda Weesner, R.N., Minetta Costa, R.N., and Jana Cerarley, L.P.T. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 23 LAURIE DIGIANTOMASSO, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, 24 25 26 27 vs. TULARE COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 28 Stipulation & Protective Order 1 CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01633-MCE-GSA STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Complaint Filed: October 17, 2014 Trial Date: March 13, 2017 1 In the above captioned case, Laurie DiGiantomasso v. Tulare County, et al., U.S.D.C. 2 (E.D. Cal.) No. 1:14-cv-01633-MCE-GSA (“the Action”), Plaintiffs Laurie DiGiantomasso, 3 Randy DiGiantomasso, and Shaymus DiGiantomasso, Deceased (“Plaintiffs”); County of 4 Kings, Sheriff David Robinson, Commander Kim Pedreiro, and Sergeant Shari Henderson 5 (“County Defendants”), California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., Taylor Fithian, M.D., Megan 6 Nabors, L.V.N., Danielle Ecker, Linda Weesner, R.N., Minetta Costa, R.N., and Jana Cerarley, 7 L.P.T. (“CFMG Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), agree that discovery and informal 8 discovery in this action is likely to involve production of private, proprietary, or security- 9 sensitive information for which protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose 10 other than this litigation may be warranted. As a result, the Parties seek to facilitate the 11 exchange of information and documents which may be subject to confidentiality limitations on 12 disclosure due to federal laws, state laws, and constitutional privacy rights. 13 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties by and 14 through their respective counsel of record, that they jointly request, pursuant to Rule 26(c) of 15 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the Court enter this [Proposed] Protective Order as an 16 Order of the Court, as follows: 17 1. For purposes of this Stipulation and Protective Order, CONFIDENTIAL 18 INFORMATION means any document, information, or tangible thing, electronic recording or 19 transcript of oral testimony, whether or not made under oath, or any portion of such a document, 20 thing, recording, or transcript, designated by any party as “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” 21 because it contains (a) proprietary information (trade secret, proprietary matter, or other 22 confidential research, development, or commercial information as those terms are used in 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26), (b) security-sensitive information that if released to the 24 public or inmate population may compromise the safety and security of a correctional facility, 25 (c) confidential personal information, such that the party making the designation avers that it 26 can and would make a showing to the Court sufficient to justify the filing of the document or 27 information under seal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Local Rule 28 141, and controlling federal case law, or (d) information reasonably believed to be protected Stipulation & Protective Order 2 1 2 from disclosure pursuant to state or federal law. 2. By way of example, the term “documents” includes but is not limited to 3 operations records, institutional records, medical records, policy and procedure manuals, 4 training materials, correspondence, emails, memoranda, or other printed or electronic matter, 5 interoffice and/or intra-corporate communications, letters, statements, contracts, invoices, 6 drafts, charts, maps, diagrams, video, photographs, medical records, institutional records, 7 personnel files, work sheets, desk diaries, recordings, specifications, compilations from which 8 information can be obtained and translated as required through detection devices into 9 reasonably usable form, sketches, drawings, notes (including laboratory notebooks and records), 10 disclosures, data, reports, work assignments, instructions, and other writings. By way of 11 example, and not limitation, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may include or be included in 12 simulations, animations, computer programs and software, magnetic or digital discs, 13 electronically recorded tapes of any sort, summaries, notes, abstracts, motions, drawings, 14 videos, photographs, and any instrument that comprises, embodies, or summarizes otherwise 15 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. 16 3. During the Action, the Parties may produce certain documents pursuant to 17 discovery requests, agreement, or in connection with the retention of experts. At the time of 18 production, the producing party will designate the documents or portions thereof that they deem 19 to contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. Only documents or portions thereof marked as 20 “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” will be subject to this Stipulation and Protective Order. 21 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION will not be disseminated or produced except in accordance 22 with this Stipulation and Protective Order. By designating a document or portion thereof as 23 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, the party making the designation avers that it can and 24 would make a showing to the Court sufficient to justify the filing of the document or portion 25 thereof under seal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Local Rule 141, 26 and controlling federal case law. 27 28 4. The designation of a document or portion thereof as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall be made, whenever possible prior to production, by placing or affixing Stipulation & Protective Order 3 1 on each page of such material in a manner that will not interfere with its legibility the words 2 “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.” If such designation is not possible prior to the 3 production, the designation must be made in writing by the producing party, and replacement 4 documents bearing the “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” designation shall be provided as 5 soon as practicable. In the event that documents subject to confidentiality, or portions thereof, 6 are inadvertently produced without being designated CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, they 7 shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION as of the date of designation. 8 5. Counsel for any party retains the right to challenge the designation of a particular 9 document or portion thereof as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. The burden of proof with 10 respect to the propriety or correctness of the designation of any document or portion thereof as 11 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION will rest on the designating party. If any party believes any 12 designation of a document or portion thereof as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION is 13 inappropriate, the Parties will meet and confer and attempt to resolve the issue on an expedited 14 basis. If the Parties are unable to mutually agree on a resolution, the Parties will seek 15 appropriate Court intervention, including a request for a discovery conference or call with the 16 Judge, and where appropriate, submit the documents to the Judge under seal to determine 17 whether and to what extent such documents or portions thereof should be deemed 18 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION in accordance with Paragraphs 1 and 3 of this Protective 19 Order. Specifically, the Judge shall determine whether the party seeking to designate 20 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION has satisfied the requirements for filing the document or 21 portion thereof sought to be designated under seal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure 26(c), Local Rule 141, and controlling federal case law. Where requested or 23 permitted by the Court, the Parties may provide the Court with separate statements containing 24 the challenges by the party opposing the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION designation and 25 the justifications by the party designating the documents or portions thereof as 26 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. 27 28 6. Whenever a deposition or court proceeding involves the disclosure of a party’s CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, the following procedure will apply: Stipulation & Protective Order 4 1 a. The court reporter will be directed to bind those portions of the transcript 2 containing CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION separately. This request will be made on the 3 record whenever possible. 4 b. The cover of any portion of a deposition or court proceeding transcript 5 that contains testimony or documentary evidence that has been designated CONFIDENTIAL 6 INFORMATION will be prominently marked: 7 CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 8 9 10 c. All portions of deposition or court proceeding transcripts designated as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION will be sealed and will not be disseminated except to the persons identified in Paragraph 10. 7. 11 Any party may designate a deposition or portion thereof as CONFIDENTIAL 12 INFORMATION and subject to the Protective Order during or for a reasonable time after the 13 deposition. If a party intends to designate portions of a deposition as “CONFIDENTIAL” that 14 party shall have the right to limit attendance at the relevant portion of the deposition to the 15 persons set forth in Paragraph 10 of this Order. For all pleadings that contain CONFIDENTIAL 16 INFORMATION, the filing party shall seek leave of court to file under seal consistent with the 17 Local Rules for the Eastern District of California. With leave of court, an unredacted version 18 will be filed under seal with the Clerk of the Court, and pleadings containing CONFIDENTIAL 19 INFORMATION will be filed in a sealed envelope prominently marked with the caption of this 20 case, the identity of the party filing the envelope, and the notation: 21 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 22 THIS ENVELOPE IS NOT TO BE OPENED NOR THE CONTENTS DISPLAYED, 23 COPIED, OR REVEALED, EXCEPT BY COURT ORDER 24 Counsel for parties agree to accept service copies of sealed pleadings by email and first-class 25 mail. 26 8. Upon a failure of the filing party to file personal, security, or proprietary 27 information under seal, any party may request that the Court place the document under seal. The 28 procedures of Local Rule 141 shall be followed. Stipulation & Protective Order 5 1 9. Either party may challenge the designation of a deposition transcript, or a portion 2 thereof, as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, under the procedure set forth in paragraph 5, 3 above. 4 10. Unless otherwise provided in this Order, and subject to the provisions of 5 Paragraph 11, access to CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION will be restricted to the Court, its 6 officers, court personnel and stenographic parties engaged in proceedings in this matter, 7 Plaintiff and Defense experts, and Plaintiff and Defense counsel (defined herein to include: 8 attorneys in this action and their support staff, including copy services, investigators, 9 consultants, paralegals, legal interns, and legal assistants), and other testifying or consulting 10 experts, where production is required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or where 11 production is ordered by the Court. Any attorney, the attorney’s support staff or expert to 12 whom disclosure is made will be furnished with a copy of the Protective Order and will be 13 subject to the Order. Nothing in this Protective Order will preclude Plaintiffs’ counsel from 14 reviewing with the Plaintiffs, decedent’s jail medical and/or custody records. 15 11. The Parties agree that CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION subject to this 16 Protective Order shall be used solely for the purposes of this litigation, and in no other 17 litigation, except as unsealed by the Court or filed in the public record in this action. 18 12. Within thirty (30) days of the conclusion of the litigation of this action, all 19 material marked as CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION under this Confidentiality Agreement 20 and not received in evidence shall be returned to the producing Party or third party, unless the 21 Parties agree that the material may be destroyed instead of being returned, in which instance 22 counsel shall certify that the documents have been destroyed. The designating party may request 23 that the Clerk of the Court return to the producing Party or third party, or destroy, any sealed 24 material and/or CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION used as evidence at the end of the 25 litigation, including appeals. This Confidentiality Agreement shall survive the discontinuance or 26 other resolution of the action. 27 28 13. As far as the provisions of any protective orders entered in this action restrict the communication and use of the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION produced thereunder, such Stipulation & Protective Order 6 1 orders shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of this litigation, except that there shall 2 be no restriction on documents that are used as exhibits in Court unless such exhibits were or 3 should have been filed under seal. 4 14. Nothing in this Stipulation and Protective Order precludes Plaintiffs or 5 Defendants from seeking and obtaining, on an appropriate showing, additional protection with 6 respect to the confidentiality of documents or portions thereof, or relief from the Protective 7 Order. 8 9 15. Each person designated in Paragraph 10, by receiving and reading a copy of the Protective Order entered by the Court as part of this Stipulation and Protective Order, agrees to 10 abide by its provisions and to see that its provisions are known and adhered to by those under 11 his or her supervision or control, and to submit to the jurisdiction of the Court in the event the 12 Protective Order is breached. 13 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 DATE: September 1, 2015 HADDAD & SHERWIN, LLP 17 18 By: 19 20 21 /s/ T. Kennedy Helm (as authorized on 9/01/15) Michael J. Haddad Julia Sherwin Genevieve K. Guertin T. Kennedy Helm Attorneys for Plaintiffs 22 23 DATE: September 1, 2015 WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP 24 25 By: 26 27 28 Stipulation & Protective Order 7 /s/ Brande L. Gustafson James J. Arendt Brande L. Gustafson Attorneys for Defendants County of Kings, Sheriff David Robinson, Commander Kim Pedreiro, and Sgt. Sheri Henderson . 1 2 DATE: September 2, 2015 3 BERTLING & CLAUSEN, LLP By: 4 5 6 7 8 /s/ Jemma Parker Saunders (as authorized on 9/02/15) Peter G. Bertling Jemma Parker Saunders Attorneys for Defendants California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., Taylor Fithian, M.D., Megan Nabors, L.V.N., Danielle Ecker, Linda Weesner, R.N., Minetta Costa, R.N., and Jana Cerarley, L.P.T. 9 10 ORDER The Court adopts the parties’ foregoing stipulated protective order with the following 11 12 13 exceptions:  14 15 The Court declines to adopt page 4, lines 19-26. To the extent motion practice is required, the parties shall comply with Local Rules 141 and 251.  The Court declines to adopt page 5, lines 17-23 (beginning with the line “With leave of 16 court . . . “). Any request to file documents under seal shall follow the guidelines set 17 forth under Local Rule 141. 18  19 20 The Court declines to adopt page 6, lines 22-26 (beginning with the line “The designating party . . .”).  The Court declines to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of the protective 21 order after the action has been closed, as requested under paragraph 13. See Local Rule 22 141.1(f). 23 The Court retains the discretion to determine the appropriate mechanism(s) for the resolution of 24 any disputes arising out of the stipulated protective order. 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 4, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 Stipulation & Protective Order 8

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?