DiGiantomasso et al v. Tulare County et al

Filing 81

STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Kings County Defendants' Subpoenas re 80 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/25/2016. Motion Hearing currently set for 1/29/2016 is CONTINUED to 2/19/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean.(Martinez, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114)
JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268)
T. KENNEDY HELM (State Bar No. 282319)
HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP
505 Seventeenth Street
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURIE DIGIANTOMASSO and RANDY
DIGIANTOMASSO, Individually and as CoSuccessor in Interest of Decedent SHAYMUS
DIGIANTOMASSO,

)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
vs.
)
)
KINGS COUNTY, a public entity; KINGS
)
COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER DAVID
)
ROBINSON, in his individual and official
)
capacity; KINGS COUNTY SHERIFF’S
)
COMMANDER KIM PEDREIRO, in her
)
individual and official capacity; KINGS
)
COUNTY SHERIFF’S SERGEANT SHERI
)
HENDERSON; CALIFORNIA FORENSIC
)
MEDICAL GROUP, INCORPORATED, a
)
California corporation; TAYLOR FITHIAN,
)
M.D.; MEGAN NABORS, L.V.N; DANIELLE )
ECKER; LINDA WEESNER, R.N.;
)
MINNETTA COSTA, R.N.; JANA CEARLEY, )
L.P.T., and DOES 1–20, individually, jointly,
)
and severally,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)

27
28
Case No. 1:14-cv-01633-MCE-EPG:

No: 1:14-cv-01633-MCE-EPG

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
QUASH KINGS COUNTY
DEFENDANTS’ SUBPOENAS
(ECF No. 80)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Plaintiffs and the Kings County Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, hereby
stipulate to the following:
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash the Kings County Defendants’ Subpoenas (Doc. 77) is currently
scheduled for hearing before this Court on January 22, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.
2. The parties believe that this matter is close to settlement, with the parties having participated
in a mediation before the Honorable Raul A. Ramirez (Ret.) on January 12, 2016.

7

3. In light of the possible settlement, and to save attorneys’ fees and costs, the parties agree to

8

continue the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash (Doc. 77) until Friday, February 19,

9

2016, at 10:00 a.m.

10
11
12

4. The parties’ Joint Statement Re: Discovery Disagreement, as required by Eastern District
Local Rule 251(c), would therefore be due on or before February 12, 2016.
SO STIPULATED

13
14

Dated: January 22, 2016

HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP

15
/s/ T. Kennedy Helm_______________
T. KENNEDY HELM
Attorneys for Plaintiff

16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: January 22, 2016

WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP
/s/ Brande L. Gustafson*______________
JAMES J. ARENDT
BRANDE L. GUSTAFSON
Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF KINGS;
SHERIFF DAVID ROBINSON; COMMANDER KIM
PEDREIRO; and SERGEANT SHERI HENDERSON

* Ms. Gustafson provided her consent that this document be electronically filed.

1
ORDER

2
3
4
5
6

Based on the above stipulation, the Court continues the hearing on the Second Amended
Motion to Quash (ECF No. 77) to February 19, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. The Joint Statement re:
Discovery Disagreement shall be due no later than February 12, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

January 25, 2016

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE