Ledesma, et al. v. Kern County, et al.
Filing
17
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/30/2015. Consent/Decline Deadline 2/9/2015. Pleading Amendment Deadline 5/1/2015. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 3/3/2015; Non-Expert 1/29/2016; Expert 5/6/2016. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 6/22/2015 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 5/20/2016; Hearing by 6/17/2016. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 7/22/2016; Hearing by 9/13/2016. Settlement Conference set for 11/4/2016 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 11/16/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 1/24/2017 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ADRIANA LEDESMA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
11
12
13
14
15
v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:14-CV-01634 - LJO - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 5/1/2015
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 3/13/15
Non-Expert: 1/29/2016
Expert: 5/6/2016
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
6/22/2015 at 9:30 a.m.
16
17
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 5/20/2016
Hearing: 6/17/2016
18
19
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 7/22/2016
Hearing: 9/13/2016
20
21
22
Settlement Conference:
11/4/2016 at 9:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
23
24
26
Pre-Trial Conference:
11/16/2016 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
27
Trial:
25
28
1
1/24/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
Jury trial: 7-14 days
1
I.
January 30, 2015.
2
3
Date of Scheduling Conference
II.
Appearances of Counsel
4
Francis Flynn appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs.
5
Andrew Thomson appeared on behalf of Defendants.
6
III.
Magistrate Judge Consent:
7
Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing
8
Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of
9
the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set
10
before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older
11
civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a
12
continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that
13
14
of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize
15
criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge
16
may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of
17
Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States
18
Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United
19
20
States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the
21
Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance
22
notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern
23
District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to
24
25
conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel
26
SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating
27
whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.
28
///
2
1
IV.
Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
2
3
motion to amend, no later than May 1, 2015.
4
V.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
At the hearing, counsel agreed to alter the normal limits on discovery to allow Defendants to
take as many as 16 depositions.
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
on or before March 13, 2015.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before
January 29, 2016, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before May 6, 2016.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before February 26,
12
2016, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before April 1, 2016. The written designation of
13
retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),
14
and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in
15
compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered
16
through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
17
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
18
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
19
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
20
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
21
22
23
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for June 22, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. before the
24
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
25
California, 93301. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed
26
by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference, and shall
27
1
28
In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health
evaluation, the examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s
report fully details the expert’s opinions in this regard.
3
1
be e-mailed, in Word format, to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The joint statement SHALL outline the
2
discovery that has been completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to
3
completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via
4
CourtCall, providing a written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk
5
no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.
6
VI.
7
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
8
than May 20, 2016, and heard on or before June 17, 2016. Non-dispositive motions are heard before
9
the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States Courthouse in
10
11
Bakersfield, California.
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned
12
Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good
13
faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the
14
moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate
15
Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the
16
court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,
17
Susan Hall at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with
18
Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice
19
and dropped from calendar.
20
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening
21
time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the
22
notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
23
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written
24
request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days
25
before the noticed hearing date.
26
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than July 22, 2016, and heard no later
27
than September 13, 2016, in Courtroom 4 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,
28
United States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R.
4
1
Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.
2
VII.
3
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary
4
adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the
5
issues to be raised in the motion.
6
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment
7
where a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has
8
merit in whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of
9
briefing; 4) narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement
10
before the parties incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a
11
joint statement of undisputed facts.
12
The moving party shall initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed
13
statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint
14
statement of undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the
15
motion, may be deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving
16
party shall file the joint statement of undisputed facts.
17
In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as
18
ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.
19
VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date
20
November 16, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Judge O'Neill.
21
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
22
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
23
directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers, by email at LJOorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
24
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
25
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
26
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
27
Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the
28
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
5
1
IX.
January 24, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,
2
3
Trial Date
United States District Court Judge.
4
A.
This is a jury trial.
5
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 7-14 days.
6
C.
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
7
California, Rule 285.
8
X.
9
Settlement Conference
A Settlement Conference is scheduled for November 4, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. at 510 19th Street,
10
Bakersfield, California. The settlement conference will be conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. If
11
any party prefers that the settlement conference be conducted by a judicial officer who is not
12
normally assigned to this matter, that party is directed to notify the Court no later than 60 days
13
in advance of the scheduled settlement conference to allow sufficient time for another judicial officer
14
to be assigned to handle the conference.
15
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall
16
appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority
17
to negotiate and settle the case on any terms2 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a
18
serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the
19
procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.
20
At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via
21
fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful3 settlement demand which includes a
22
brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.
3
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation.
6
1
settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or
2
with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is
3
appropriate.
If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their
4
5
Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall
6
not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
7
At least five court days before the settlement conference, the parties shall submit, directly to
8
9
10
Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov, a confidential settlement
conference statement.
11
The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:
12
A.
A brief statement of the facts of the case.
13
B.
A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which
14
the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on
15
the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.
16
C.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
17
D.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.
18
E.
The relief sought.
19
F.
The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.
20
21
XI.
Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other
22
Techniques to Shorten Trial
23
The Defendants will seek to try the case in phases, in particular, to try the issue of the
24
individual’s liability before the Monell liability and to have a damages and a punitive damages phase.
25
Counsel will need to address this issue at the pretrial conference.
26
XII.
There are no pending related matters.
27
28
Related Matters Pending
///
7
1
2
XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
3
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
4
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently
5
handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided
6
in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
7
California.
8
XIV. Effect of this Order
9
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
10
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
11
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
12
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
13
subsequent status conference.
14
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
15
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations
16
extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by
17
affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
18
for granting the relief requested.
19
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 30, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?