Ledesma, et al. v. Kern County, et al.

Filing 41

ORDER GRANTING #35 the Motion to Appoint Raquel Sierra as the Guardian ad Litem for Minor Plaintiff M.L., signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/22/2015. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADRIANA LEDESMA, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 v. COUNTY OF KERN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:14-cv-01634 - LJO - JLT ORDER GRANTING THE MOTION TO APPOINT RAQUEL SIERRA AS THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR MINOR PLAINTIFF M.L. (Doc. 35) “A minor . . . who does not have a duly appointed representative may sue by a next friend or by 18 a guardian ad litem.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). In addition, a court “must appoint a guardian ad litem - 19 or issue another appropriate order - to protect a minor or incompetent person who is unrepresented in 20 an action.” Id. The law of the state of California determines whether a guardian ad litem may be 21 appointed in this matter. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(b). 22 Pursuant to California law, a minor may bring suit as long as a guardian conducts the 23 proceedings. Cal. Fam. Code §§ 6502, 6601. In determining whether to appoint a particular guardian 24 ad litem, the Court must consider whether the minor and the guardian have divergent interests. Cal. 25 Code Civ. P. § 372(b)(1). 26 Here, Raquel Sierra clarifies she is the mother of the child, M.L. and that she seeks to act as the 27 guardian ad litem in this proceeding. (Doc. 40 at 3) The complaint does not reveal any adverse 28 interests between Ms. Sierra and the child and Ms. Sierra attests that she has no adverse interests. Id. 1 1 As a result, it appears, Ms. Sierra’s appointment as guardian ad litem for her child is appropriate. See 2 Burke v. Smith, 252 F.3d 1260, 1264 (11th Cir. 2001) (“Generally, when a minor is represented by a 3 parent who is a party to the lawsuit and who has the same interests as the child there is no inherent 4 conflict of interest.”); see also Anthem Life Ins. Co. v. Olguin, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37669, at *7 5 (E.D. Cal. May 9, 2007) (observing “[a] parent is generally appointed guardian ad litem”). Therefore, 6 the Court is acting within its discretion to approve the appointment of Ms. Sierra as the guardian ad 7 litem. See United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, etc., 795 F.2d 796, 804 (9th Cir. 1986) 8 Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 9 1. (Doc. 35) is GRANTED; and 10 11 The motion for appointment of Raquel Sierra as guardian ad litem for Plaintiff M.L. 2. Raquel Sierra is APPOINTED to act as guardian ad litem for Plaintiff M.L., and is authorized to prosecute this action on the child’s behalf. 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 22, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?