Ledesma, et al. v. Kern County, et al.
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING #35 the Motion to Appoint Raquel Sierra as the Guardian ad Litem for Minor Plaintiff M.L., signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/22/2015. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ADRIANA LEDESMA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01634 - LJO - JLT
ORDER GRANTING THE MOTION TO APPOINT
RAQUEL SIERRA AS THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM
FOR MINOR PLAINTIFF M.L.
(Doc. 35)
“A minor . . . who does not have a duly appointed representative may sue by a next friend or by
18
a guardian ad litem.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). In addition, a court “must appoint a guardian ad litem -
19
or issue another appropriate order - to protect a minor or incompetent person who is unrepresented in
20
an action.” Id. The law of the state of California determines whether a guardian ad litem may be
21
appointed in this matter. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(b).
22
Pursuant to California law, a minor may bring suit as long as a guardian conducts the
23
proceedings. Cal. Fam. Code §§ 6502, 6601. In determining whether to appoint a particular guardian
24
ad litem, the Court must consider whether the minor and the guardian have divergent interests. Cal.
25
Code Civ. P. § 372(b)(1).
26
Here, Raquel Sierra clarifies she is the mother of the child, M.L. and that she seeks to act as the
27
guardian ad litem in this proceeding. (Doc. 40 at 3) The complaint does not reveal any adverse
28
interests between Ms. Sierra and the child and Ms. Sierra attests that she has no adverse interests. Id.
1
1
As a result, it appears, Ms. Sierra’s appointment as guardian ad litem for her child is appropriate. See
2
Burke v. Smith, 252 F.3d 1260, 1264 (11th Cir. 2001) (“Generally, when a minor is represented by a
3
parent who is a party to the lawsuit and who has the same interests as the child there is no inherent
4
conflict of interest.”); see also Anthem Life Ins. Co. v. Olguin, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37669, at *7
5
(E.D. Cal. May 9, 2007) (observing “[a] parent is generally appointed guardian ad litem”). Therefore,
6
the Court is acting within its discretion to approve the appointment of Ms. Sierra as the guardian ad
7
litem. See United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, etc., 795 F.2d 796, 804 (9th Cir. 1986)
8
Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
9
1.
(Doc. 35) is GRANTED; and
10
11
The motion for appointment of Raquel Sierra as guardian ad litem for Plaintiff M.L.
2.
Raquel Sierra is APPOINTED to act as guardian ad litem for Plaintiff M.L., and is
authorized to prosecute this action on the child’s behalf.
12
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 22, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?