Ledesma, et al. v. Kern County, et al.

Filing 81

ORDER CLOSING CASE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/10/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ADRIANA LEDESMA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16
17

) Case No.: 1:14-cv-01634 DAD JLT
)
) ORDER CLOSING CASE
)
) (Doc. 80)
)
)
)
)
)

On January 6, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action. (Doc. 80) Federal

18

Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court

19

order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.”. . .” Fed. R.

20

Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the

21

dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th

22

Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice

23

of dismissal with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a).

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 10, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE