Ledesma, et al. v. Kern County, et al.
Filing
81
ORDER CLOSING CASE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/10/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ADRIANA LEDESMA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
) Case No.: 1:14-cv-01634 DAD JLT
)
) ORDER CLOSING CASE
)
) (Doc. 80)
)
)
)
)
)
On January 6, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action. (Doc. 80) Federal
18
Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court
19
order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.”. . .” Fed. R.
20
Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the
21
dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th
22
Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice
23
of dismissal with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a).
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 10, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?