Autry v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/19/2015 CONTINUING the discovery cut-off date to 12/18/2015 as to the plaintiff's deposition only. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PENNY AUTRY, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 vs. WAL-MART STORES, INC. a corporation, and DOES 1 to 100, Defendants. Case No. 1:14-cv-01635-TLN-EPG ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUTOFF TO ALLOW FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF TO FACILITATE SETTLEMENT State Ct. Action Filed: August 19, 2014 Discovery Cut-off: November 20, 2015 Pre-trial Conf: August 11, 2016 Trial date: October 17, 2016 Judge: Hon. Troy L. Nunley Magistrate: Judge Erica P. Grosjean 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1.14cv1635.stipo.1 117.autry 28 Case No. 1:14-CV-01635-TLN-EPG ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation to Continue Discovery Cut-Off, in order to 3 allow for Plaintiff’s deposition to occur following the parties’ settlement discussions. 4 No other discovery shall be allowed under this continuance other than Plaintiff’s 5 deposition, as specifically noted below, and finding GOOD CAUSE for such an 6 Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following dates will govern this action: 7 EXISTING AND PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT DATES 8 9 10 11 Matter Current Date Proposed Date Discovery cut-off (to allow for Plaintiff’s November 20, December continued deposition ONLY) 2015 2015 18, 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: November 19, 2015 16 17 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1.14cv1635.stipo.1 117.autry 28 2 Case No. 1:14-CV-01635-TLN-EPG ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1.14cv1635.stipo.1 117.autry 28 1 PROOF OF SERVICE Case No. 1:14-cv-01635-TLN-EPG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?