Autry v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/19/2015 CONTINUING the discovery cut-off date to 12/18/2015 as to the plaintiff's deposition only. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PENNY AUTRY,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
vs.
WAL-MART STORES, INC. a
corporation, and DOES 1 to 100,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:14-cv-01635-TLN-EPG
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION
TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUTOFF TO ALLOW FOR A
CONTINUANCE OF THE
DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF TO
FACILITATE SETTLEMENT
State Ct. Action Filed: August 19, 2014
Discovery Cut-off: November 20, 2015
Pre-trial Conf:
August 11, 2016
Trial date:
October 17, 2016
Judge: Hon. Troy L. Nunley
Magistrate: Judge Erica P. Grosjean
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1.14cv1635.stipo.1
117.autry
28
Case No. 1:14-CV-01635-TLN-EPG
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation to Continue Discovery Cut-Off, in order to
3
allow for Plaintiff’s deposition to occur following the parties’ settlement discussions.
4
No other discovery shall be allowed under this continuance other than Plaintiff’s
5
deposition, as specifically noted below, and finding GOOD CAUSE for such an
6
Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following dates will govern this action:
7
EXISTING AND PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT DATES
8
9
10
11
Matter
Current Date
Proposed Date
Discovery cut-off (to allow for Plaintiff’s November 20, December
continued deposition ONLY)
2015
2015
18,
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated: November 19, 2015
16
17
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1.14cv1635.stipo.1
117.autry
28
2
Case No. 1:14-CV-01635-TLN-EPG
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1.14cv1635.stipo.1
117.autry
28
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
Case No. 1:14-cv-01635-TLN-EPG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?