Windham v. Marin et al

Filing 3

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:14-cv-2336 DAD PC) to Fresno (1:14-cv-1636 BAM PC) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/17/2014. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES W. WINDHAM, 12 No. 2:14-cv-2336 DAD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 M. MARIN et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged 20 violations took place at California State Prison, Corcoran, in Kings County, which is part of the 21 Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See 22 Local Rule 120(d). 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 24 division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the 25 court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. 26 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 28 California sitting in Fresno; and 1 1 2 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 3 4 5 Dated: October 17, 2014 6 7 8 DAD:9 wind2336.22 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?