Windham v. Marin et al

Filing 31

ORDER ADOPTING 28 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's Request for Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 05/15/2015. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLES W. WINDHAM,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
M. MARIN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01636-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
(ECF Nos. 25, 26, 28)

Plaintiff Charles W. Windham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

21

On April 21, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff’s

22

request for injunctive relief be denied. The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff

23

and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (ECF

24

No. 28.) More than fourteen days have passed and no objections have been filed.

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de

26

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and

27

recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations issued on April 21, 2015, are adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief is HEREBY DENIED.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

May 15, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2