Windham v. Marin et al
Filing
59
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 37 Request to Order Defendants to Submit a "Verified" Answer to the Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/23/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
CHARLES W. WINDHAM,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
v.
M. MARIN, et al.,
13
14
Defendants.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:14-cv-01636-DAD-BAM (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST TO ORDER DEFENDANTS TO
SUBMIT A “VERIFIED” ANSWER TO THE
COMPLAINT
(ECF No. 37)
Plaintiff Charles W. Windham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this
17
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth
18
Amendment claims of excessive force against Defendants M. Marin, D. Uribe, W. Rasley, J.
19
Contreras, A. Capano, R. Rubio, and Doe #1, and for deliberate indifference to serious medical
20
needs against Defendants C. Navarro, V. Morales, M. Marin, and S. Shiver.
21
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for the Court to order Defendants to
22
submit a verified answer, in which Plaintiff argues that Defendants should be required to submit
23
a verified answer to his complaint. (ECF No. 36). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a),
24
every pleading must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name, but
25
“[u]nless a rule or statute specifically states otherwise, a pleading need not be verified or
26
accompanied by affidavit.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). The answer here is signed by Defendants’
27
counsel of record, and there is no rule or statute in the circumstances of this case requiring any
28
verified answer.
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for the Court to order
Defendants to submit a verified answer (ECF No. 37) is DENIED.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
December 23, 2015
6
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?