International Chemical Supplies, Inc., et al. v. Restoration Energy, LLC, et al.
Filing
11
ORDER STRIKING the Responsive Pleadings 8 10 ; ORDER to Defendant Restoration Energy, LLC to SHOW CAUSE Why Default Should Not Be Entered, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/12/2015. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL
SUPPLIES, INC., et al.
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiffs,
v.
RESTORATION ENERGY, LLC, et al.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01645 - --- - JLT
ORDER STRIKING THE RESPONSIVE
PLEADINGS (Docs. 8, 10)
ORDER TO DEFENDANT RESTORATION
ENERGY, LLC TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED
On December 22, 2014, Peter F. Schaefer, President of Restoration Energy, LLC, filed a
18
Motion to Dismiss the complaint filed by Plaintiffs International Chemical Supplies, Inc. and
19
Petroverde Caribe S.A. (Doc. 8.) In addition, Schaefer filed an answer to the complaint and
20
counterclaim for breach of contract on behalf of Restoration Energy, LLC. (Doc. 10.)
21
Importantly, Schaefer is unable to represent Restoration Energy, LLC in this action. Although
22
he reports he is the president of the organization, any entity must appear “only through licensed
23
counsel.” Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993); see also United States v. High
24
Country Broad. Co., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993). As a result, Local Rule 183(a) of the Eastern
25
District of California provides that “[a] corporation or other entity may appear only by an attorney.”
26
As such, the answer and motion to dismiss must be stricken.
27
28
Further, to the extent that Schaefer seeks to hold Antonio Jatar Alonso liable for breach of
contract, he is unable to state a claim on behalf of the entity. In federal courts, “parties may plead and
1
1
conduct their own cases personally or by counsel.” 28 U.S.C. § 1654. “It is well established that the
2
privilege to represent oneself pro se provided by § 1654 is personal to the litigant and does not extend
3
to other parties or entities.” Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc., 546 F.3d 661, 664 (9th Cir. 2008). Thus,
4
only two forms of representation are authorized by Section 1654: “that by an attorney admitted to the
5
practice of law by a governmental regulatory body and that by a person representing himself.” See
6
Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 139 (2d Cir.2007)). As such, the counterclaims filed by Schaefer
7
on behalf of Restoration Energy, LLC are improper, and must be stricken.
8
Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
9
1.
The Motion to Dismiss filed on December 22, 2014 (Doc. 8) is STRICKEN;
10
2.
The Answer to the Complaint and Counterclaim filed December 22, 2014 (Doc. 10) is
STRICKEN; and
11
12
3.
Defendant Restoration Energy, LLC, SHALL show cause within 30 days of the date of
13
service why default should not be entered, or in the alternative, file a notice of
14
appearance by licensed counsel and an appropriate responsive pleading.
15
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 12, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?