Kindred v. Allenby et al
Filing
86
ORDER REQUIRING Parties to Provide Status Update; Deadline: April 26, 2018, 4:30 p.m. signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/12/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
RICHARD S. KINDRED,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
Case No. 1:14-cv-01652-AWI-MJS (PC)
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO PROVIDE
STATUS UPDATE
v.
(ECF NO. 52)
CLIFF ALLENBY, et al.,
DEADLINE: April 16, 2018, 4:30 p.m.
Defendants.
15
16
17
Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
18
rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds against
19
Defendants Bigot and Bell on Plaintiff’s First Amendment free exercise claim. With one
20
exception, discussed below, discovery has closed. (ECF No. 32, 52.) The dispositive
21
motion deadline has passed. (ECF No. 32.) The matter is ready to be set for trial.
22
On November 21, 2017, the Court held an informal discovery dispute conference.
23
(ECF No. 52.) Therein, Plaintiff agreed to provide defense counsel with a list of
24
Interdisciplinary Notes for which he sought additional information. Defendants agreed to
25
respond with the requested information within ten days of receipt of Plaintiff’s list. The
26
parties were ordered to thereafter informally advise the Court if they felt that this and
27
other discovery issues raised at the conference had been resolved.
28
1
On February 23, 2018, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation to extend, to
2
March 30, 2018, Plaintiff’s deadline for providing his list to Defendants. (ECF No. 80.)
3
Based on that deadline, the deadline for Defendants to respond has passed.
4
Accordingly, the parties are HEREBY ORDERED to file, by 4:30 p.m. on April 16, 2018,
5
a statement on the status of discovery.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 12, 2018
/s/
9
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?