Chandler v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Administratively Close Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 01/30/2015. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

KATHLEEN L. CHANDLER,

13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.
CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC.,

16
17
18

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 1:14-cv-01670---SKO
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF
COURT TO ADMINISTRATIVELY
CLOSE CASE

19
20
21
22
23

On January 22, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).
In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows:

25

[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action with a court order by filing: (i) a notice of
dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for
summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who
have appeared.

26

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). "The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some

27

or all of his claims, through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice," and the dismissal "automatically

24

28

Page 1

1

terminates the action as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice." Wilson v. City of

2

San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

3
4
5
6

Because Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of this case with prejudice under Rule
41(a)(1)(A)(i), this case has automatically terminated. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is to
administratively close this case.

7
8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 30, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Page 2