ACA Insurance Company v. Osterhout, et al
Filing
10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/11/2014. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ACA INSURANCE COMPANY.,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. 1:14-CV-01676----MJS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE
DARREN OSTERHOUT; NEVAEH
WEBB, by and through her guardian ad
litem GREGORY OSTERHOUT and
DOES 1-10,
Defendant.
18
19
On December 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with
20
Prejudice of this entire action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A)(i)
21
which provides in relevant part:
22
[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of
23
dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for
24
summary of judgment.
25
26
27
Such a Rule 41 (a)(1) notice of dismissal “automatically terminates the action as
to the defendants who are subjects of the notice.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111F. 3d
688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).
28
1
1
Plaintiff’s Notice of Dismissal complies with the provisions of Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(i).
2
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice
3
and the Clerk shall CLOSE the case.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 11, 2014
/s/
7
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?