Grant v. Capella University et al

Filing 14

ORDER RE: Plaintiff's Request for Clarification 12 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/2/15. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 O’DEAN M. GRANT, 9 Plaintiff 10 11 12 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION v. CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, SOPHIA PATHWAYS, AND DOES 1-12, (Doc. 12) Defendants 13 14 CASE NO. 1:14-CV-1678 AWI JLT This case was removed from Superior Court, County of Kern. On November 26, 2014, 15 Plaintiff filed a motion entitled “Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. #1331” that sought a 16 hearing on December 9, 2014 in Kern County Superior Court. Doc. 8. Defendants filed a separate 17 motion to dismiss that was set for hearing on December 8, 2014. The court conflated the motions 18 and took both matters under submission. Doc. 10. The issue was brought to the court’s attention 19 by Defendants. Plaintiff’s motion was reset for January 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 2. 20 Doc. 11. 21 Plaintiff now asks to appear telephonically at the January 20, 2015 hearing, asks for the 22 court to provide a copy of Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and expresses concern that “the hearing 23 seems to indicate that my motion to dismiss is no longer under submission for legal consideration 24 and subsequent decision.” Doc. 12. Plaintiff’s motion will be considered by the court. The 25 motion was originally taken under submission by mistake; a hearing date was set in order to allow 26 oppositions and replies to be filed. Once the further briefing has been received, the court will 27 determine whether oral argument on January 20, 2015 is necessary or whether the motion should 28 be taken under submission without holding a hearing. So, Plaintiff’s request to appear 1 telephonically is denied. As to his request for a copy of Defendants’ motion, the record indicates 2 that both the notice of motion and memorandum of points and authority were mailed to Plaintiff’s 3 address (808 Melwood Street, Bakersfield, CA 93307) on November 3, 2014. Doc. 7, 3; Doc. 7-1, 4 10. Plaintiff’s request for another copy of these documents is denied. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 2, 2015 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?