State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Barnett et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/17/15 ORDERING the Court declines to sign the parties' stipulation and proposed order filed on December 15, 2015, which concerns the distribution of the remaining interpleader funds deposited with the Court since the stipulation does not address how any accrued interest is to be paid after the Court's registry fee is deducted therefrom. Any future stipulation and proposed order concerning the distribution of interpleader funds shall state using percentages how the remaining interest is to be distributed after the registry fee is satisfied.(Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8

STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiffs,

9

ORDER

v.

10
11

No. 1:14-cv-01688-GEB-SAB

LUZ PATRICIA BARNETT, JENNA
McCAIN, and KYLE BARNETT,

12

Defendant.

13
14

The Court declines to sign the parties’ stipulation and

15

proposed order filed on December 15, 2015, which concerns the

16

distribution of the remaining interpleader funds deposited with

17

the Court since the stipulation does not address how any accrued

18

interest

19

deducted therefrom. Any future stipulation and proposed order

20

concerning the distribution of interpleader funds shall

21

using percentages how the remaining interest is to be distributed

22

after the registry fee is satisfied.

23

Dated:

is

to

be

paid

after

the

Court’s

registry

fee1

is

state

December 17, 2015

24
25
26
27
28

1

The amount of the registry fee is computed pursuant to the Guide to
Judiciary Policy, Vol. 13, Ch. 9, ' 920.50.20 (“Computation of Registry
Fees”).

1