Bradford v. Marchak
Filing
307
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Motions to Strike (ECF Nos. 288, 289, 292, 293) and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 291), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/24/2018: Plaintiff's motions to strike (Docs. 298 , 299 ) are denied. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
v.
M. MARCHAK, et al.,
Defendants.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01689-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
TO STRIKE (ECF Nos. 288, 289, 292, 293) AND
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF No.
291)
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
In the Court’s orders issued on April 2, 2018 (Doc. 266) and April 16, 2018 (Doc. 287),
18
Plaintiff was informed that future repetitive, misnamed, overlapping, and otherwise harassing filings
19
would be summarily denied. Plaintiff has filed two more meritless motions to strike. (Docs. 298, 299.)
20
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motions to strike (Docs. 298, 299) are denied.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 24, 2018
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?