Williams v. Wasco State Prison et al

Filing 18

ORDER Directing Prison To Produce Information To Assist In Identifying John Doe Defendants (ECF No. 16 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/13/2015. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
10

LANCE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13

v.
WASCO STATE PRISON, et al.,

CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01714-MJS (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING PRISON TO
PRODUCE INFORMATION TO ASSIST IN
IDENTIFYING JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS
(ECF No. 16)

Defendants.

14
15
16

I.

17

Plaintiff, Lance Williams, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

18
19

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has
consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction.

20
On May 13, 2015, the Court found that Plaintiff had stated cognizable medical
21
22

indifference claims against two John Doe correctional officers and ordered Plaintiff to

23

identify documents that would enable him to ascertain their identities. (ECF No. 12.)

24

Plaintiff filed a subpoena and declarations in response. (ECF No. 13.) The Court

25

requested Plaintiff to resubmit the subpoena after narrowing its scope and clarifying its

26

contents. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff’s amended subpoena, filed June 17, 2015 (ECF No.

27
28

16), is now before the Court. The Court will treat it as a motion for discovery and
1
respond accordingly.
2
II.

3

Plaintiff provides descriptions of the two male John Doe correctional officers who

4
5

are defendants in this action:

6
7
8

Request for Identification of Correctional Officers

1. John Doe 1 was on duty on D-Yard, Building No. 4, working B-Side cell No. 236
between lights out on April 5, 2014 and dawn on April 6, 2014. Plaintiff describes him as
either white or Hispanic, between 5’9” and 6’ tall, either balding or having white or grey

9
10
11

hair.
2. John Doe 2 was on duty on D-Yard, Building No. 4, working B-Side, cell No.

12

236 during the second-watch shift between 6 a.m. and 8 a.m. on April 6, 2014. Plaintiff

13

describes John Doe 2 as “older,” short, white or Hispanic.

14
15
16

These descriptions clearly suffer from a lack of specificity. However, that
shortcoming is compensated in part by the limited number of individuals who likely were
on duty at that place during the times specified. Ruling out women, African-Americans,

17
18

and men more than six feet in height, should narrow the list further.

19

To enable this legitimate inquiry to proceed, the Court hereby Orders Defendants

20

to provide to the Court, for its in camera review, a list of all correctional officers who fall

21

within the above criteria. Upon receipt, the Court will give the parties notice if and how it

22

determines the inquiry may reasonably and productively proceed.

23

In addition, Defendants shall provide to the Court for its in camera review any log

24
entries, grievances, medical request forms, or any other complaints, forms or notations
25
26
27

pertaining to Plaintiff on April 5 and 6, 2014, his fall from the bunk, and the injuries he
suffered as a result; and a list of correctional officers who signed, authored, or

28
2

otherwise approved or confirmed the accuracy of reports identifying them as individals
1

possibly having knowledge of the Doe Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s cell on April

2
3

5th and 6th, 2014.

4

III.

5

Plaintiff has declared under penalty of perjury that to his belief Inmate Dozier,

6

CDC # AR-9431, at one time housed in D-Yard, Building 4, A-Side, cell No. 122 and

7

Parolee Jerry Kelly, Plaintiff’s former cellmate in D-Yard, Building 4, B-Side, cell No.

8

Contact Information of Inmate Dozier and Parolee Kelly

236, were witnesses to Plaintiff’s interactions with Does 1 and 2 on April 5-6, 2014 and

9
10
11

could help identify them.
Defendants shall forthwith, and in no event later than 21 days from the date of

12

this Order, provide to Plainitff Dozier’s current contact information, the name of Kelly’s

13

parole officer, and Kelly’s last known contact information. This Order does not relieve

14

Plaintiff of his obligations to ensure compliance with the procedures for inmate contact

15
16

with a parolee or other inmate under Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15 § 3139.
IV.

CONCLUSION & ORDER

17
18

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS:

19

1. Plaintiff’s requests for information (ECF No. 16) are granted in part;

20

2. Wasco State Prison is directed to provide, for the Court’s in camera review:

21

a. the names of any correctional officers meeting Plaintiff’s description;

22

b. any log entries, grievances, or other forms pertaining to Plaintiff’s fall

23

from his bunk or the Doe Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s cell on April

24
5 and 6, 2014;
25
26
27
28
3

c. the names of any correctional officers identified as witnesses to or
1

having knowledge of the Doe Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s cell on

2
April 5 and 6, 2014; and

3
4

3. Wasco State Prison is directed to provide Plaintiff with the contact information
of Inmate Dozier and Parolee Kelly.

5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated:

July 13, 2015

/s/

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4