Perez v. Padilla
Filing
16
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 15 Request for Entry of Default signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/9/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSEPH PEREZ,
12
1:14-cv-01730-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF=S
REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
(ECF No. 15; also resolves ECF No. 14.)
R. PADILLA,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
I.
BACKGROUND
21
Joseph Perez (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
22
with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint
23
commencing this action on November 6, 2014. (ECF No. 1.) On November 6, 2014, Plaintiff
24
consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(c), and no
25
other parties have made an appearance. (ECF No. 3.) Therefore, pursuant to Appendix A(k)(4)
26
of the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, the undersigned shall conduct any and
27
all proceedings in the case until such time as reassignment to a District Judge is required.
28
Local Rule Appendix A(k)(3).
1
1
The court screened Plaintiff’s Complaint and issued an order on February 5, 2015,
2
dismissing the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 9.) On
3
April 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint, which awaits the court’s requisite
4
screening. (ECF No. 12.)
5
On September 8, 2015, Plaintiff filed a request for entry of default against defendant
6
Padilla. (ECF No. 15.)
7
II.
ENTRY OF DEFAULT
8
Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative
9
relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of
10
Civil Procedure and where that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
11
55(a). Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, A[A] defendant must serve an
12
answer within 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint; or if it has timely
13
waived service under Rule 4(d), within 60 days after the request for a waiver was sent.@ Fed.
14
R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). Under Rule 4(d), a defendant may waive service of a summons by
15
signing and returning a waiver of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). If a defendant fails to plead or
16
otherwise defend an action after being properly served with a summons and complaint, a
17
default judgment may be entered pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil
18
Procedure.
19
Plaintiff’s Request
20
Plaintiff requests entry of default against defendant Padilla. Plaintiff provides a proof
21
of service showing that he mailed a copy of the First Amended Complaint to defendant Padilla
22
on September 3, 2015. (ECF No. 15 at 2.) Plaintiff asserts that defendant Padilla has not
23
responded and therefore default should be entered against defendant Padilla.
24
Discussion
25
Plaintiff’s proof of service is not sufficient to show that defendant Padilla was properly
26
served with process pursuant to Rule 4. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Moreover, it is not time for service
27
of process in this case, because the court has not completed its requisite screening. The court is
28
required by law to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a
2
1
governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity, such as the instant action
2
brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983, and the court will initiate service of process sua sponte
3
after the court has screened the complaint and determined that it contains cognizable claims for
4
relief against defendant Padilla. 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A(a). Here, the First Amended Complaint
5
awaits the court’s screening, and defendant Padilla has not been properly served. Therefore,
6
Plaintiff’s request for entry of default must be denied.
7
III.
8
9
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff=s request for entry of
default against defendant Padilla, filed on September 8, 2015, is DENIED.
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 9, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?