Crawford v. City of Bakersfield et al

Filing 101

ORDER Disregarding 100 Motion to Proceed IFP and Directing Clerk of Court to Forward Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to Ninth Circuit signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/05/2016. (Flores, E)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

LESLIE LARAY CRAWFORD,
Plaintiff,

7

ORDER DISREGARDING DIRECTING
CLERK OF COURT TO FORWARD
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS TO NINTH CIRCUIT

v.

8
9

Case No. 1:14-cv-01735-SAB

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al.,
(ECF No. 100)
Defendants.

10
11

On November 23, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an

12

13 order directing Plaintiff to “file a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis” or pay the
14 $505.00 docketing and filing fee for Plaintiff’s appeal. (ECF No. 98.) On December 2, 2016,
15 Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 100.) As Plaintiff is
16 responding to the order of the Ninth Circuit, Plaintiff’s appliction to proceed in forma pauperis
17 should have been filed in the Ninth Circuit.
18

According, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

19

1.

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DISREGARDED; and

20

2.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to forward Plaintiff’s application to

21

proceed in forma pauperis to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth

22

Circuit.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Dated:

December 5, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

1