Birdsall v. James, et al.

Filing 56

ORDER Regarding Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal, With Prejudice 55 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/20/2018: This action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the Court. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear his or her own litigation costs and attorney's fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WILLIAM BIRDSALL, 8 9 10 Plaintiff, v. JAMES, 11 Case No. 1:14-cv-01738-DAD-BAM (PC) ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 55) Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff William Birdsall (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 14 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 19, 2018, defense 15 counsel filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 16 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 55.) The stipulation is signed by Plaintiff and counsel for 17 Defendant James, indicating that Plaintiff has agreed to voluntarily dismiss Defendant James 18 from this matter with prejudice, the parties so stipulate, and each party shall bear its own 19 litigation costs and attorney’s fees. 20 Accordingly, as Defendant James is the only remaining defendant in this action, and in 21 light of the parties’ voluntary dismissal of Defendant James, this action is terminated by operation 22 of law without further order from the Court. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear his or 23 her own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara November 20, 2018 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?