Rodriguez v. Palmero
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, for failure to state a claim signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/27/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
CHARLIE RODRIGUEZ,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
PALMERO, M.D., et al.,
16
Case No. 1:14-cv-01742 DLB PC
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT
WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
STATE A CLAIM
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
TERMINATE ACTION
Defendants.
17
Plaintiff Charlie Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and
18
19
in forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on
20
November 7, 2014.1 He names Palmero, M.D., as Defendant.
On September 8, 2015, the Court screened the complaint and determined that Plaintiff failed
21
22
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Section 1983. Plaintiff was provided an
23
opportunity to file an amended complaint and he was directed to file the amended complaint within
24
thirty (30) days. Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212-13 (9th Cir. 2012). Over thirty days have
25
passed and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise communicate with the
26
Court. Plaintiff was forewarned: “If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint in compliance with
27
this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim.”
28
1
Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge on December 8, 2014.
1
1
2
3
4
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim
under section 1983;
2.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate this action in its entirety.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
October 27, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?