Jones v. Power

Filing 16

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/3/14 ORDERIG that the pending MOTION to DISMIS 15 is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The hearing set for 1/15/15 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2 before District Judge Troy L. Nunley, Jr. is VACATED; and The parties are informed that Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone's Chambers will set a new hearing date at the Court's convenience. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN JONES, 12 13 14 Case No. 1:14-cv-01746-TLN-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER REFERRING PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE STANLEY A. BOONE v. HARVEST POWER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Defendants Harvest and Sam Monaco (“Defendants”) removed this action from the 18 Tulare County Superior Court to the Eastern District of California on November 7, 2014. (ECF 19 No. 1.) Plaintiff John Jones (“Plaintiff”) filed a first amended complaint on November 13, 2014. 20 (ECF No. 6.) On November 26, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First 21 Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 15.) 22 Due to the Court’s impacted caseload, the Court has reviewed the pending motion and 23 finds that it should be referred to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone for entry of findings and 24 recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 25 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. Boone; 27 28 The pending motion to dismiss is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. 2. The hearing set for January 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2 before District 1 Judge Troy L. Nunley, Jr. is VACATED; and 1 2 3 4 3. The parties are hereby informed that Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone’s Chambers will set a new hearing date at the Court’s convenience. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: December 3, 2014 6 7 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?