Hunt v. Landau et al
Filing
3
ORDER Granting 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/13/14. (Verduzco, M)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MAURICE HUNT,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-1757 --- BAM
ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS APPLICATION
(Doc. 2).
v.
ELANA S. LANDAU; MICHAEL S. FRYE;
NICHOLAS POTTRATZ; DETECTIVE
DAVID FRIES; FRESNO COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF
INMATE FILING FEE
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
RETURN CONSENT FORMS
/
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to
15
16
Title 28 of the United States Code section 1915(a). Plaintiff has made the showing required by section
17
1915(a), and accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. §
18
1915(a). However, Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $400.00 for this action. 28
19
U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). He is also obligated to make monthly payments in the amount of twenty percent
20
(20%) of the preceding month’s income credited to plaintiff’s trust account. The United States
21
Penitentiary, Tucson, Arizona, is required to send the Clerk of the Court payments from Plaintiff’s
22
23
24
account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00, until the statutory filing fee is paid in
full. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
25
Additionally, Plaintiff is advised that the Court is required to screen complaints of pro se
26
litigants pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code section 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a
27
complaint or portion thereof if the litigant has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,”
28
that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a
1
1
defendant(s) who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)&(2). As a result, summonses
2
will not issue at this time. The Court will direct the United States Marshal to serve Plaintiff’s
3
complaint only after the Court has screened the complaint and determined that it contains cognizable
4
claims for relief against the named defendants. The Court has a large number of such cases pending
5
before it and will screen Plaintiff’s complaint in due course.
In accordance with the above and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
6
7
8
that:
1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.
9
2. The Warden of the United States Penitentiary, Tucson, Arizona or his designee,
10
11
shall collect payments from plaintiff’s prison trust account in an amount equal to
12
twenty per cent (20%) of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s
13
trust account and shall forward those payments to the Clerk of the Court each
14
time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §
15
1915(b)(2), until a total of $400.00 has been collected and forwarded to the Clerk
16
17
of the Court. The payments shall be clearly identified by the name and number
18
assigned to this action.
19
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of
20
plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application on the Warden of the United States
21
Penitentiary, Tucson, Arizona.
22
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial
23
24
Department, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, Fresno Division.
25
5. Finally, the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a “Consent to Magistrate
26
Jurisdiction Form” to Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall complete the form and advise the
27
Court whether or not he will consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction no later
28
2
1
than December 5, 2014. Plaintiff is advised that failure to complete the form may
2
result in dismissal of this action.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
November 13, 2014
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?