Hairston v. Curliss et al

Filing 6

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION for Plaintiff's Failure to Pay Filing Fee 5 ,signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/13/2015. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT KURT HAIRSTON, 12 13 14 CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01760-LJO-MJS (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE v. R. CURLISS, et al., 15 (ECF No. 5) Defendants. CLERK TO CLOSE CASE 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 of the United States 20 District Court for the Eastern District of California. 21 On November 24, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and 22 recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application and to require Plaintiff 23 to pay the filing fee in full. (ECF No. 4.) On December 18, 2014, the undersigned 24 adopted the findings and recommendations and ordered Plaintiff to submit the $400 filing 25 fee in full within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff specifically was cautioned that 26 his failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. (Id.) Local Rule 110. The 27 twenty-one day deadline has passed and Plaintiff has not submitted the filing fee. 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without 1 prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 110 for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filling fee. The Clerk 2 is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this case. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill January 13, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?