Palomo v. City of Sanger et al

Filing 55

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/21/2017 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice as to all parties and all causes of action. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 Barry M. Walker (SBN 195947) Amy M. Oakden (SBN 148408) 2 WALKER TRIAL LAWYERS, LLP admin@walkertriallawyers.com 3 31504 Railroad Canyon Road, Ste. 2 Canyon Lake, CA 92587 4 951.667.5792 951.821.7150 fax 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff, 6 ELLEN PALOMO 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WALKER TRIAL LAWYERS 31504 RAILROAD CANYON ROAD, SUITE 2 CANYON LAKE, CA 92587 TELEPHONE: 951.667.5792 10 11 ELLEN PALOMO, 12 CASE NO.: 1:14-CV-01769-TLN-SAB Plaintiff, REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER 13 vs. 14 CITY OF SANGER, a municipal corporation; CITY OF SANGER 15 MAYOR JOSHUA MITCHELL, in his official capacity and as an individual; 16 CITY OF SANGER CITY MANAGER BRIAN HADDIX, in his official 17 capacity and as an individual; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 Pursuant to the previously-filed Notice of Settlement (Docket No. 52), comes 2 now Plaintiff Ellen Palomo, by and through her attorney of record, Barry M. Walker 3 and, respectfully requests the Court to dismiss the above-referenced case with 4 prejudice as to all parties and all causes of action. 5 Respectfully submitted, 6 DATED: April 19, 2017 WALKER TRIAL LAWYERS, LLP 7 By: /s/ Barry M. Walker 8 Barry M. Walker Amy M. Oakden Attorneys for Plaintiff, ELLEN PALOMO 9 WALKER TRIAL LAWYERS 31504 RAILROAD CANYON ROAD, SUITE 2 CANYON LAKE, CA 92587 TELEPHONE: 951.667.5792 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 DATED: April 21, 2017 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?