Johnson v. Cate, et al

Filing 9

ORDER approving 4 Stipulation and granting Defendants and extension of time to respond to complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/13/2014. (Response due by 11/24/2014).(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GREGORY DAVID JOHNSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

Case No. 1:14-cv-01771-SKO
ORDER APPROVING PARTIES’ STIPULATION
AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

M. CATE, et al.,
(Doc. 4)

15

Defendants.
Response Deadline: 11/24/2014

16
17

This civil action was removed from Sacramento County Superior Court on October 27,

18

2014. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). On November 6, 2014, Plaintiff and Defendants Cate and Hartley

19

filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their response to the complaint.1

20

Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c)(2).
The stipulation is hereby approved and Defendants’ response to the complaint is due on or

21
22

before November 24, 2014.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

25

November 13, 2014

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

1

The parties are alerted that their stipulation contains a typographical error, as it refers to 2012 rather than 2014.

1