Vega v. Weatherford U.S., Limited Partnership et al

Filing 53

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/28/2015. Pleading Amendment Deadline 12/11/2015. Class Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 10/9/2015; Non-Expert 2/29/2016; Expert 3/25/2016. Mid-Discovery Status Conferenc e set for 12/17/2015 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Class Certification Motion Deadlines: Filed by 4/29/2016; Opposition by 5/27/2016; Reply by 6/17/2016; Hearing set for 7/21/2016 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

STEPHANIE A. VEGA, as an individual, and )
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
WEATHERFORD U.S., LIMITED
)
PARTNERSHIP, et al.,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No.: 1:14-CV-01790- JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 12/11/2015
Class Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 10/9/2015
Non-Expert: 2/29/2016
Expert: 3/25/2016
Mid-discovery status conference: 12/17/2015, 9 a.m.

18

Class Certification Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 4/29/2016
Opposition: 5/27/2016
Reply brief: 6/17/2016
Hearing: 7/21/2016 at 9 a.m.

19
20
21
22

I.

September 28, 2015.

23
24

II.

Sophia Behnia appeared on behalf of Defendants.

26

28

Appearances of Counsel
Hernaldo Baltodano and Paul Haines appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

25

27

Date of Scheduling Conference

III.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

motion to amend, no later than December 11, 2015.
1

1

IV.

To the extent they have not been completed as yet, the parties SHALL exchange the initial

2
3

Class Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date

disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before October 9, 2015.

4

A.

Outstanding data requests

5

No later than November 30, 2015, Defendant will produce timekeeping and payroll records in

6

their electronic native format which exist for Defendants’ non-exempt employees in California during

7

the putative class period, with employee names redacted but with employees identified with an unique

8

employee identification numbers.
No later than November 13, 2015, Defendant SHALL provide Plaintiffs an estimate of the

9
10

number of timekeeping and payroll records maintained in paper format.
No later than December 11, 2015, Defendant SHALL provide the timekeeping and payroll

11
12

records maintained in paper format.1
No later than September 25, 2015, Defendants will request that the claims administrator

13
14

prepare a class list for Plaintiffs’ Fair Labor Standards Act claim, reflecting the individuals who have

15

opted into the action, including any late opt-ins.
Based upon these deadlines, the motion to compel, currently set on December 14, 2015, is

16
17

DROPPED from calendar. Whether the motion needs to be refiled may be discussed at the mid-

18

discovery status conference the Court sets herein.

19

B.

Class discovery deadlines

20

The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts and experts related

21

to class discovery on or before February 29, 2016, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before

22

March 25, 2016.
The parties are directed to disclose all class expert witnesses, in writing, on or February 5,

23
24

2016, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before March 4, 2016. The written designation of

25

retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),

26

and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in

27
28

1

Defendant will provide the “paper documents” either in paper form or in an electronic format. If the number of paper
documents comprise a significant number, counsel SHALL work together to develop an acceptable sampling protocol.

2

1

compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered

2

through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

3

The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R.

4

Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to

5

designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other

6

evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

7
8

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

9

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

10

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement

11
12

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
The Court sets a mid-discovery status conference is on for December 17, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. A

13
14

Joint Mid-Discovery Status Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be

15

electronically filed in CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference, and shall be e-mailed, in Word

16

format, to [e-mail]. The joint statement SHALL outline the status of Defendants’

17

production of the electronic and paper format timekeeping and payroll records, the discovery that has

18

been completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to completing the

19

discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via CourtCall, providing a

20

written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court

21

days before the noticed hearing date.

22

V.

23

Pre-Trial Motion
Non-dispositive motions are heard at 9:00 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in

24

Bakersfield, California, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

25

Counsel may appear by telephone via the CourtCall service.

26

No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

27

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

28

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the
3

1

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

2

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

3

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

4

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with

5

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

6

and dropped from calendar.
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening

7
8

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

9

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules

10
11

230 and 260.

12

VI.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

13

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

14

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

15

to be raised in the motion.

16

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where

17

a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in

18

whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4)

19

narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties

20

incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of

21

undisputed facts.

22

The moving party shall initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

23

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement

24

of undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may

25

be deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the

26

joint statement of undisputed facts.

27
28

In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and
conferred as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and
4

1

confer. Failure to comply will result in the motion being disregarded and dropped from

2

calendar.

3

VII.

Motion for class certification
The motion for class certification SHALL be filed no later than April 29, 2016. Opposition to

4
5

the motion SHALL be filed no later than May 27, 2016. Neither the motion nor the opposition

6

SHALL exceed 30 pages, exclusive of evidence and evidentiary objections, unless leave is granted by

7

the Court prior to the filing. Any reply SHALL be filed no later than June 17, 2016 and shall not

8

exceed 15 pages, exclusive of evidentiary objections. Any objections to the evidence SHALL be filed

9

at the same time as the opposition (for Defendant) and the reply (for Plaintiff).2 A hard-copy, courtesy

10

copy of all filings related to the class motion SHALL be sent via overnight mail to the Chambers of

11

Judge Thurston at the United States Courthouse, 510 19th Street Suite 200, Bakersfield, CA 93301, at

12

the same time the filing is submitted. All of the pages of evidence in the hard copy SHALL be

13

numbered, tabbed and indexed.
The hearing on the motion for class certification is set on July 21, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. before

14
15

Judge Thurston.

16

VIII. Settlement Conference
The parties indicate they may engage in mediation with a private neutral. If the parties believe

17
18

the matter is in a settlement posture and desire a settlement conference, they may file a joint request

19

that the Court schedule a settlement conference.

20

IX.

Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

21
22

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

23

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its

24

increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil

25

Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

26

///

27
28

2

No motions to strike evidence will be entertained. If the Court sustains an objection to a piece of evidence, the
evidence will not be considered.

5

1
2

X.

Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

3

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

4

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

5

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

6

subsequent status conference.

7

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

8

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

9

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

10

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

11

for granting the relief requested.

12

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 28, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6