Hernandez v. Stanislaus County et al
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/21/2014 TRANSFERRING this case and the pending 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to Fresno Division. New Case Number 1:14-cv-1830 SAB. Old Case Number 2:14-cv-2704 GEB KJN.(Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID S. HERNANDEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:14-cv-2704-GEB-KJN PS
ORDER
STANISLAUS COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On November 18, 2014, plaintiff, who proceeds without counsel and is a resident of
18
Stanislaus County, filed this action alleging federal civil rights and other violations against
19
defendants, who are also alleged to be residents of Stanislaus County. (ECF No. 1.) Pursuant to
20
Local Rule 120(d), “[a]ll civil and criminal actions and proceedings of every nature and kind
21
cognizable in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California arising in
22
Calaveras, Fresno, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Stanislaus, Tulare, and
23
Tuolomne counties shall be commenced in the United States District Court sitting in Fresno,
24
California….” After a review of plaintiff’s complaint, the court concludes that this action arises
25
in Stanislaus County, because the plaintiff and defendants are residents of Stanislaus County, and
26
the underlying events allegedly occurred in Stanislaus County. In light of plaintiff’s pro se status,
27
filing in the Sacramento division of the Eastern District of California was likely an inadvertent
28
mistake. As such, the court directs that the action be transferred to the Fresno division. See E.D.
1
1
Cal. L.R. 120(f) (“Whenever in any action the Court finds upon its own motion...that the action
2
has not been commenced in the proper court in accordance with this Rule, or for other good
3
cause, the Court may transfer the action to another venue within the District”).
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1. The Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER the action, including the pending motion to
6
proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) to the Fresno division.
7
2. The Clerk of Court shall vacate all dates and close the Sacramento division case.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated: November 21, 2014
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?