Gutierrez v. Lackner

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING 17 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections to Findings and Recommendations signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/15/2017. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 SALVADOR FERNANDO GUTIERREZ, Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS 14 15 16 17 Case No. 1:14-cv-01834-DAD-MJS v. (Doc. 17) HEIDI M. LACKNER, Warden, Respondent. 18 19 Petitioner has requested an extension of time in which to file objections to the 20 Court’s Findings and Recommendation. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Petitioner’s 21 motion is granted. Petitioner is provided thirty (30) days from the issuance of this order in 22 which to file objections to the Findings and Recommendation. 23 Petitioner also seeks explanation of the Court’s order entitled “Findings and 24 Recommendation”. That Order contains the Court’s factual and legal findings. Here, it 25 found that Petitioner’s claims lacked merit and that Petitioner was not entitled to habeas 26 relief. Based on those findings, the Order also included the Magistrate Judge’s 27 recommendation to the District Court Judge that the petition be denied. 28 1 1 2 Petitioner, in his objections, should address any and all portions of the Findings and Recommendation that he believes were wrongly reasoned or decided. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: January 15, 2017 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?