Valdez v. Beard et al

Filing 99

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 88 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/22/2018: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

15

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiff,

13
14

1:14-cv-01839-AWI-MJS (PC)

RUBEN VALDEZ,

v.
JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,

(ECF No. 88)

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On

December

26,

2017,

the

magistrate

judge

issued

findings

and

recommendations (ECF No. 88) to deny Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No.
79) of the order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF
No. 54). No objections have been filed and the time for doing so has passed
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304,
the Court has conducted a de novo review of Plaintiff’s case. The Court finds the findings
and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
1

1
2
3
4
5

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations issued December 26, 2017 are
adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: March 22, 2018
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2