Hudson v. Archeuleta

Filing 12

ORDER DENYING as Moot, 11 , Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/6/2015. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DANA HUDSON D., Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 14 v. KATHERINE L. ARCHUELETA, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Case No. 1:14-CV-01855-LJO-SKO ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Doc. 11) Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 16 On March 5, 2015, Plaintiff filed a third application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 17 11.) Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") was granted on December 1, 2014. 18 (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff filed another application to proceed IFP on January 20, 2015, which was denied 19 as moot. (Docs. 7, 8.) Plaintiff is informed that she is proceeding IFP, there is no need to file any 20 additional requests to proceed IFP, and any future requests to proceed IFP will be summarily 21 stricken from the record. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's March 5, 2015, request to proceed 23 IFP is DENIED AS MOOT. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 6, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?